this post was submitted on 26 Feb 2025
119 points (79.9% liked)

politics

31231 readers
2054 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/february-harvard-caps--harris-poll-58-of-voters-are-more-satisfied-with-trumps-job-as-president-than-biden-302383357.html

Just a reminder to not let Lemmy be your echo chamber. Most people either don't know about the shit we care about, or don't care.

Unfortunately, it will probably get worse.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 39 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Yeah. Republicans love trump and hate biden. Democrats hate trump and only centrist democrats like biden.

[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 26 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (6 children)

All of Trump's key policies received majority support except for renaming the Gulf of Mexico to the Gulf of America, with deportation of illegal immigrants who have committed crimes (81%), eliminating fraud and waste in government expenditures (76%), and closing the border (76%) as the top three most supported policies.

Surely the proletariat will express their disgust with fascism any day now, we just had to Teach The Dems(tm) first. Any day now.

[–] dan@lemmy.i.secretponi.es 34 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Based on the sample, this seems like a disingenuous poll.

  • We always deported felons. Yet, P01135809's deportation rate is actually lower than Biden's.

  • We always fought to eliminate fraud and waste. The GOP has invited felons convicted of fraud into the government.

  • The border isn't closed and hasn't been.

If you're asking these sorts of questions it feels more like push polling propaganda than an honest assessment of feelings.

[–] billiam0202@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago

It is a bullshit poll.

eliminating fraud and waste in government expenditures

If you ask that question, without being extremely specific as to how "fraud" and "waste" are defined, you're going to get mass agreement. Nobody wants their tax dollars misused. But a Dem might say giving subsidies to the oil industry is fraud and waste, while a Republican might say any money spent on non-billionaires is fraud and waste.

[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It doesn't matter that we've always fought to eliminate fraud and waste and that the GOP is full of frauds. They support Dear Leader 'eliminating' fraud and waste.

Facts don't matter, man.

[–] dan@lemmy.i.secretponi.es 11 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I guess that's my point. If the poll is not based on anything other than bullshit, what's the point of giving it any consideration?

We may as well be discussing a poll on everyone's favorite Teletubby.

[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

I guess that’s my point. If the poll is not based on anything other than bullshit, what’s the point of giving it any consideration?

Because people approve of bullshit. Because people vote based on bullshit. Because people form their worldviews on bullshit.

[–] Willy@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 years ago

there's is a lot of nuances with those top three. they sound pretty good as an idea but I'm against trumps definition and actions on each of those items

[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Ah, I see what the article got wrong now. They think he actually wants to implement those policies instead of just being evil for no reason and using those as a guise.

[–] Eatspancakes84@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Did they ask about “siding with Russia over Ukraine”, or “Making peace in Ukraine in three weeks”? Yes framing matters, and obviously people support policies that are framed like “eliminating fraud and waste in government expenditure “. Wonder how that position is affected if you add the subclause “by kids that come straight out of high school “.

[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

72% of voters say they want Ukraine to negotiate a settlement with Russia instead of winning the war. 60% of voters favor Trump announcing direct U.S.-Russia negotiations (Democrats: 40%; Republicans: 85%; Independents: 53%).

59% of voters oppose the Trump administration leaving Ukraine's leaders out of negotiations with Russia. 55% of voters oppose the exclusion of European leaders.

57% of voters oppose the Trump administration forcing Ukraine to make territorial concessions to end the war, and 66% of voters say Ukraine should receive security guarantees from the U.S. if it were to make concessions.

61% of voters say security guarantees should be contingent on Ukraine sharing revenue from rare earth elements to pay back U.S. military support.

63% of voters believe Russia will continue to advance onto other countries if it successfully claims Ukrainian territory.

[–] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I support deporting undocumented immigrants who commit a crime... for certain definitions of crime. I am not aware of anyone in my personal circle who would say that someone who bypassed asylum seeking to enter the country undocumented and then raped someone should be allowed to stay... the issue is that the administration considers all undocumented immigrants to be equally worthy of deportation while disallowing reasonable legal paths to immigrate.

Due to the sematic bad faith tools in place it's extremely difficult to actually gauge legitimate opinion since that wording evokes a particular ideation in conservatives and the administration exploits that mismatch to commit actions that most Americans find objectionable.

[–] Malfeasant@lemm.ee 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

So someone enters the country illegally, commits a crime, you want to just send them back? To do it all again? Rather than, you know, put them in jail for the crime?

[–] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 years ago

Yes, coupled with actual paths to immigrate legally even without "marketable skills".

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago

God damn, you will never stop being salty that genocide wasn't a winning issue.

[–] gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Yeah, plus a lot of people in the Democratic party are more comfortable going after Ilhan Omar and protesting college students than their Republican friends, so the counter messaging has been totally incoherent and confused and that's gotta be helping Trump's poll numbers a bit

[–] alvvayson@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 2 years ago

And quite frankly, among (young) progressive people, getting attacked head-on by Trump is somewhat more predictable and less emotionally taxing than getting backstabbed and gaslighted by liberals.

Which is why a lot of them didn't vote for Kamala.

I don't yet know where the American political realignment will end, but the liberal/progressive coalition that elected Clinton, Obama and Biden seems to be irreparably damaged.

[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

Yeah. There's nothing like cutting our own throats.