this post was submitted on 25 Feb 2025
547 points (99.5% liked)

News

36118 readers
2976 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

[Sorry folks. When I submitted the article I had both the URL and added an image file as thumbnail for the article. Somehow the image file replaced the article. Here's the article. Adding a link in here too].

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Maybe we shouldn't fuck around with not voting or voting 3rd party in presidential elections so the dumbest among us don't get to keep calling the shots.

[–] JustARaccoon@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

When the vote is either voting for status quo or voting for something worse, that's not a fair vote, it's one made under duress

[–] zalgotext@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Voting under duress seems like a better option than not voting though

[–] SmilingSolaris@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Except the status quo loses. We can argue all day that status quo is better than the alternative but that doesn't win elections. There is no amount of pressure or bullying or arguing that makes that a winning election strategy.

At that point, it's the fault of the status quo party for not moving off that status quo. It's the fault of party leadership for not shifting to progressive change and instead saying "steady as she goes"

[–] zalgotext@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sure, yeah, whatever, place blame where you want to. Doesn't change the fact that "getting to vote" is better than "not getting to vote"

[–] SmilingSolaris@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Brother in Christ, how many elections do the Dems need to lose before it's their fault for running the same status quo handbook? Do you actually give a shit about trying to fix anything, place blame on the decision makers who have a choice, or so you just want to grand stand on a vague general population and rage against human nature resulting in low voter turnout that literally nobody can solve? We can be mad together that people didn't come out to vote, but ultimately we can't change that. So what the fuck do you want?

[–] zalgotext@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago

I think you misunderstand me. We likely aren't getting the chance to vote again. That's my point, that's it. I'm not trying to place blame, I'm not trying to fix anything, I'm not raging or grandstanding, I'm merely making a prediction. Which is that because Trump won the election, that's the last real election we'll have.

[–] JustARaccoon@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Well yes but that's the problem, we need to think outside the box, revolutions are seen as a thing of the past but maybe everyone could learn from the french

[–] zildjiandrummer1@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Someone hasn't read a history book it seems. Please, enlighten us about how that revolution turned out.

[–] SecondaryAnnetagonist@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I believe Robespierre had lead a period of time known as the "reign of good times and normal vibes" where they all formed committees to talk out and mediate the the problems of the system they lived under.

[–] SmilingSolaris@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Only someone with no knowledge of pre revolution France would say this.

[–] zildjiandrummer1@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The point is that a revolution didn't make things any better overall. It just sucked in different ways.

[–] SmilingSolaris@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

It ultimately gave us the ideals that would go on to end monarchism in Europe. It killed the French monarchy legitimacy until it was ultimately destroyed.

Once again, only if you know nothing about the French revolution would you say that.

[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So any revolution against aristocracy obviosly leads to a Bonaparte, is your theory huh. ok.

[–] zildjiandrummer1@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

Yep, I made a blanket statement about every revolution that has ever existed... Of course I didn't say that, why are you putting words in my mouth? The French Revolution ended poorly for most in the following 40 years. That's what I said.

[–] a9cx34udP4ZZ0@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Did someone prevent you from voting in the primaries? Or running in the primaries if you didn't like the people running?

The candidates don't just magically appear on the ballot. What you're complaining about is "the majority of people didn't want something as progressive as I did so it was duress".

"I'm not getting my way so it's not fair" resonates about as much as "the election was stolen because my guy didn't win". Do you have the right to not vote at all? Sure. But then don't say a fucking thing when the world around you is collapsing becuase the other guy is inifnitely worse than what you were too proud or stubborn to vote for.

Progressives who refuse to vote for a moderate because "compromise is a four letter word" are as bad or worse than the tea party morons who started the republican party down the path of fascism.

[–] reiterationstation@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

I’m not saying you’re wrong when I say that 70 million dumb fucks still voted for this, allegedly.

[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Maybe the dem leadership shouldnt fuck around with acting like republican lites while committing crimes against humanity also while expecting to run and win as a democrat?!?

Maybe they shouldnt be that arrogant and stupid, and maybe you shouldnt carry their water. Maybe, maybe maybe.

[–] Vytle@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Stop chastising people for not compromising their morals by voting for a party they don't fully agree with.

Voting 3rd party is not the same thing as not voting; but god forbid somebody disagree with you I guess

Also the fuck won by a landslide anyways