this post was submitted on 02 Jul 2024
3 points (100.0% liked)

World News

54247 readers
2874 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

“(With) today’s Supreme Court decision on presidential immunity, that fundamentally changed. For all practical purposes, there are virtually no limits on what the president can do. It’s a fundamentally new principle and it’s a dangerous precedent because the power of the office will no longer be constrained by the law even including the supreme court of the United States.”

Throughout his address, Biden underscored the gravity of the moment, emphasizing that the only barrier to the president’s authority now lies in the personal restraint of the officeholder. He warned vehemently against the prospect of Trump returning to power, painting a stark picture of the dangers such an outcome could pose.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Then fucking do something about it Joe! The DNC has been little more than passive observers to the raise of fascism.

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 0 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Since we're talking about a SCOTUS ruling, it would be on Congress to pass legislation.

And to follow up on @teodor_from_achewood@lemmy.world's comment, the Democratic National Committee is a private party organization that supports Democratic candidates in elections. They have nothing to do with passing legislation.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

It's on Biden to personally demonstrate to SCOTUS just how dangerous the ruling was.

[–] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Still. The DNC has systems in place to decide who to back in elections to pass legislation. Their messaging since 2015 has been embarrassing. They keep courting moderate conservatives that don't exist and ignoring unrepresented potential voters who do. They talk about how they win elections when there's good turn out without ever analyzing which candidates encourage high turnout. Americans want to feel represented in politics and we don't. The Democrats need to do something that would weaken the democrat party but would weaken the Republican party more: they need to actively begin dismantling the two party system. We want election reform. We want the police to not be a hostile force against the general populace. We want the society we live in to benefit everyone and not just the kinds of people who can afford to finance an election campaign.

The polling exists. We all know that neither party represents or enacts what the people want do. The Democrats refuse to look around and see what's happening, preferring to rearrange the deck chairs as the ship sinks because that's the only thing they know to do. And you know? I can't really blame them. We the people have also been rearranging the deck chairs. We live in a country that only benefits the top but we all still show up to do our duties without looking at what's going on in other countries where the people are standing up to their authoritarian oppressors.

The worst part is the fascists know what they're doing. They know to decay the structure by raising the temperature because we've become too complacent. We need to stand up to fascism in a way that we haven't ever since McArthyism.

[–] teodor_from_achewood@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago (2 children)

The DNC has systems in place to decide who to back in elections to pass legislation.

No it does not.

[–] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Then what the fuck is a primary and how do they decide to back in a primary and what the fuck is a super delegate?

[–] teodor_from_achewood@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Bernie lost because he didn't get enough votes.

[–] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 1 points 2 years ago

Sure. And I voted for warren. My point isn't "The DNC needs to get their heads out of their asses and make Bernie their nominee" my point is "The DNC needs to get their heads our of their asses and realize their current overall strategy is a losing one"

[–] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Ya but was there a thumb on the scale to push people one way?

[–] teodor_from_achewood@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] MutilationWave@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

What would you call almost everyone dropping out and backing Biden right before super Tuesday but a thumb on the scale? Less severe but directly traceable to the DNC, what would you call giving debate questions in advance to one candidate but not the other but a thumb on the scale?

This is just what I know of.

[–] teodor_from_achewood@lemmy.world -2 points 2 years ago

Conspiracy theory nonsense.

[–] teodor_from_achewood@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

"The DNC" doesn't do what you think it does.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It doesn't do what it should.

The point of the party is supposed to be long-term strategy and putting the platform over any one person.

When people talk about what the DNC should be doing, it's not some "gotchya" to point out that they're not doing their job and leadership needs replaced.

It's just proving their point

[–] teodor_from_achewood@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

So because the National Committee's short and long term strategy is not what you'd be doing, you think they're not doing anything.

Do you do any local political organizing?

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

you think they’re not doing anything.

What's their long term plan?

As far as I can tell, it's only prevent progressives from taking control of the party.

[–] teodor_from_achewood@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (2 children)

For now, they're planning on getting out voters for the general election, and recruiting volunteers along the way.

Most planning falls to state and local parties - which you can easily get involved in.

Why haven't you?

[–] Zorque@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

So basically the only thing they care about is winning, not actually representing peoples values?

Theyre more than just an election committee, thats what the DCCC is for.

[–] anlumo@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Of course they are in it for the money, what do you think?

[–] lone_faerie@lemmy.blahaj.zone -1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I think they should be working for the people. The government isn't (supposed to be) a money making scheme.

[–] anlumo@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago

Yes, but that's not how it works in practice. Running a government is a huge money-making machine, and so it attracts the worst kind of people.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago

For now,

Bruh...

Do you know what "long term planning" means?

If you don't think they have one, say it.

[–] crusa187@lemmy.ml -1 points 2 years ago

Some might call them enablers at this point.