this post was submitted on 25 Feb 2025
80 points (96.5% liked)

Steam Hardware

20122 readers
138 users here now

A place to discuss and support all Steam Hardware, including Steam Deck, Steam Machine, Steam Frame, and SteamOS in general.

As Lemmy doesn't have flairs yet, you can use these prefixes to indicate what type of post you have made, eg:
[Flair] My post title

The following is a list of suggested flairs:
[Deck] - Steam Deck related.
[Machine] - Steam Machine related.
[Frame] - Steam Frame related.
[Discussion] - General discussion.
[Help] - A request for help or support.
[News] - News about the deck.
[PSA] - Sharing important information.
[Game] - News / info about a game on the deck.
[Update] - An update to a previous post.
[Meta] - Discussion about this community.

If your post is only relevant to one hardware device (Deck/Machine/Frame/etc) please specify which one as part of the title or by using a device flair.

These are not enforced, but they are encouraged.

Rules:

Link to our Matrix Space

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] BlackAura@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

Capcom specifically does two releases of Monster Hunter by two different studios, sort of alternating, for this reason.

MH World and Icebreak were the "fancy PC / Console games"

Then MH Rise and Sunbreak were the "mobile" releases.

Now MH Wilds is another "fancy PC / Consoles" release.

So Capcom does actually account for this.

[–] redisdead@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

I did the benchmark and what I saw on my screen does not explain the dogshit performance.

Maybe they should drop the 'fancy pc/console division'

[–] skulblaka@sh.itjust.works -2 points 10 months ago (2 children)

I have no idea how they pull this off though, because Rise looks damn near about as good as World does IMO, with faster and crazier gameplay, and runs at 80 higher FPS. Either their "fancy PC game" team is trash or their mobile team is legendary, because I don't see how a minor change of art style and small drop in the number of individual grasses per map made such a huge change.

Now, Wilds does look a little crazy and I can understand how exactly the Deck might struggle on that one. But the playability difference between World and Rise without losing much graphical fidelity genuinely blew my mind. World limps along at 14 FPS on the Deck and Rise plays smooth as butter on the Switch as well as the Deck.

[–] argarath@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Don't start your comment with blatant lies like rise looking "dam near about as good as world". I don't have the time to take my own pictures of both games to clearly show how much simpler rise is in comparison to world, so these google image pics will have to do for now, but for anyone who played both games your comment is laughably wrong

Rise

World

[–] SilverCode@lemm.ee 2 points 9 months ago

I have no skin in this game (played the switch version, didn't care for the game loop) but the first one looks slightly worse, but much more appealing. It has enough detail to get the mind juices flowing but with a visual simplicity to grow what is happening at a glance. The second one looks nice, but I struggle to tell what is going on at a glance.

[–] skulblaka@sh.itjust.works 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Nice cherry picking of the densest area of detail in World vs an empty open field in Rise.

Rise looks great when you aren't looking for ways to dunk on it.

Besides which, World was such a sluggish beast that I was running the game on minimum settings anyway just to play the damn thing. So uh, I never got to see how beautiful it looks in your photo. Sure, it's detailed, it looks good, it also runs like shit so maybe 10% of players got to actually see that. My point here was that Rise was a very impressive gain in performance for a relatively small loss in graphical fidelity. Good job Capcom, well done.

[–] argarath@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

Here's a video of someone just playing rise, you can clearly see how low definition the models, map and textures are. Link to the reddit post since I can't upload the video

And here's another video, on youtube this time and I did take the tracking off, of a person walking through the ancient forest.

But here's a more direct comparison between the model of rathalos on monster hunter world vs monster hunter rise (I couldn't upload the image for some reason so here's the link to the reddit post)

[–] Mako_Bunny@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 10 months ago

Lmao it's not even close