this post was submitted on 18 Feb 2025
17 points (94.7% liked)

Fairphone

809 readers
16 users here now

Community for the FairPhone
Forum | Code

@[email protected]

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The Fairphone strategy is also basically an advertisement. We should never trust a company to give an accurate impression of what they are doing when it is part of their marketing. They have every incentive to present the best possible face. Their product depends on feeling like you are doing good by buying it. And often, doing less harm means spending more money, decreasing their own profits, so companies will give a rosie picture and not mention, say, their complicity in union busting or worse or how much more the (inevitably OECD) executives and VPs pay themselves than the people who actually build the product.

If workers owned and controlled the production facilities we could feel a bit better about it, as they would be able to at least advocate for themselves.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

A statement from the union of their unionized factory saying the things this NGO says would be much more solid.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

Yes, it wouod certainly be better! Of course, once workers have morw buy-in at a for-profit company they also have incentive to improve the company and its marketing, but at least the owners have been somewhat undermined in their nonsense.