Trigger Warning: Community contains mostly bad environmental news (not by choice!). Community may also feature stories about animal agriculture and/or meat. Until tagging is available, please be aware and click accordingly.

🪲

Aussie Zone Rules.

Golden rule - be nice. If you wouldn’t say it in front of your ~~grandmother~~ favourite tree, don’t post it.
No bigotry - including racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia. You are allowed to denigrate invasive plants or animals.
Be respectful. Everyone should feel welcome here. Except invasive plants or animals.
No porn. Except photos of plants. Definitely not animals.
No Ads / Spamming. Except for photos or stories about plants and animals.
Nothing illegal in Australia. Like invasive plants or animals. Exotic microbes and invasive fungi also not welcome.
Make post titles descriptive with no swear words. Comments are a free for all using the above rules as a guide. Fuck invasive plants and animals.

🐝

/c/Aussie Environment acknowledges the Traditional Owners of the land, sea and waters, of the area that we live and work on across Australia. We acknowledge their continuing connection to their culture and pay our respects to their Elders past and present.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

lodion@aussie.zone

Gorgritch_umie_killa@aussie.zone

zero_gravitas@aussie.zone

We love luxury goods, as long as you don’t tell us they're sustainable (www.qut.edu.au)

submitted 11 months ago by Gorgritch_umie_killa@aussie.zone to c/environment@aussie.zone

11 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Ms Joenpolvi said similar results were found in posts on the luxury cars – those that included progress-focused language about sustainability achieved well above the average shares on Facebook for each brand.

“The posts that mentioned their luxury cars had ‘sustainable materials’, ‘eco-friendly materials’ or were fighting ‘plastic pollution’ achieve dismal shares, such as just 6 per cent of the average shares for that brand.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Gorgritch_umie_killa@aussie.zone 9 points 11 months ago (1 children)

That idea of dirtiness people express because a product has been 'used' must play into the nehative reactions to this langauge positioning as well.

I suppose people here aren't gona like my rebrand to u/gorgritchumierecycler then... damn!

[–] vividspecter@lemm.ee 6 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Recycled water seems to elicit the same disgust reflex, to draw a comparison.

[–] Gorgritch_umie_killa@aussie.zone 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, i remember seeing the videos in the city getting people to 'taste the difference' or pick the 'recycled water'. Lot of surprise when people picked the wrong ones.

[–] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Humans have a Columbus complex with the stuff they buy. They didn't get there first but they want to feel like they discovered it.

[–] Gorgritch_umie_killa@aussie.zone 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Oh, so true! I love that description.

I guess the challenge for a marketer is to successfully make the connection between reused and recycled with new. I suppose thats why a lot more people focus on words like 'sustainable'.

[–] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Finally a real use for gendered marketing. Reforged Bogroll and Reborn Hygienic Tissue

[–] Gorgritch_umie_killa@aussie.zone 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Ha, your good at this.

[–] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

I guess if you want good marketing, hire someone who hates marketing