this post was submitted on 11 Feb 2025
165 points (97.7% liked)

News

36829 readers
1618 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

For nearly an hour on Monday night, Republican Rep. Nancy Mace of South Carolina gave an unprecedented speech on the House of Representatives floor accusing four men — including her ex-fiancé — of rape, sex trafficking and sexual misconduct against her and other women.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Chocrates@lemmy.world 40 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Welp I'm sorry for her and hope she gets justice and closure.
Even though she is a hateful wretch.
Nobody deserves to be raped or abused.

[–] Telorand@reddthat.com 46 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I agree that nobody does.

However, after she's screeched about trans people existing and how persecuted she is for her bigoted version of religion, forgive me if I want to see receipts in her case. Republicans are historically all about optics to push some personal agenda.

You can only cry wolf so many times before it just becomes noise.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The third-term lawmaker from South Carolina, who is considering a run for governor, also accused her would-be GOP rival of not investigating the allegations.

[–] Chocrates@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I know. I have decided to believe all victims, until proven otherwise, but I see how bad the optics are.

[–] Telorand@reddthat.com 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's my general practice as well, but I feel compelled to make an exception in her case. She needs to earn back my trust (what little there was to begin with).

[–] KnitWit@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It really doesn’t help that she falsely accused someone of assault over a handshake like 3 months ago. Or that she spray painted her own property to claim she was being targeted by the dreaded antifa. To say that she has a history of history of attacking her opponents this way would be an understatement.

[–] MagicShel@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 year ago

Yeah, she has fucking destroyed her own credibility. Maybe this shit happened, and she certainly didn't deserve that. But her say so isn't worth the paper it's printed on.

[–] earphone843@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 year ago

No one deserves it, but I have a hard time finding any sympathy for people who want to use legislation to hurt others.

[–] MothmanDelorian@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

That being said she's the person Im least likely to believe making these kinds of claims.

[–] MellowYellow13@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Even if she wishes this and other harm on others?

[–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yes, even then.

You don't have morals if they're conditioned on the identity of the person they're being applied to. That just makes you a different flavor of bigot.

Nobody deserves to be sexually assaulted, even the people you don't like.

[–] MothmanDelorian@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That being said Mace has a history of false claims of attacks on her by others so I am not inclined to believe her since her complaint is that her opponent in a race did not investigate these claims not that these men attacked her.

[–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Sure, but there's a large difference between questioning someone's credibility and approving of them being sexually assaulted.

That is to say there's a large moral difference between "she has a history of making up claims for attention, so I don't believe her" and "she wishes harm on others, so I hope she gets sexually assaulted".

I mean, just on the face of it, it is hypocritical to wish harm on someone because they wish harm on someone. Is wishing harm on someone wrong, or is it not?

Unfortunately, people seem to have no grasp of nuance and just react with the most outrageous takes. In my mind I just assume that these commenters are literally children, who're simply copying bad behaviors and not actual functioning adults with the ability to self-reflect. But, that's more for my own sanity.

[–] Llewellyn@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago

P diddy does. And o j Simpson. And, probably, Kanye