News
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.
Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.
7. No duplicate posts.
If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.
All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
view the rest of the comments
They won't because they have to pay for college and they are taking advantage of sports scholarships. They're kind of fucked here and it really shouldn't be put on them to do something like that.
It's a matter of numbers. The bosses always pretend they'll just fire people for defiance, but if whole teams strike they don't really have a way to pull that off without grievously harming their business. (And while the NCAA is itself a nonprofit, it definitely has business interests.)
It's not fair, but solidarity and social resistance is going to involve good people taking risks when they could have just gone along instead. That's the whole meaning of the 'First they came for' poem.
I'm afraid that is not how scholarships work. They are contracts. If you do not fulfill your contract, the scholarship is taken away from you.
These women either keep playing with the team or lose their scholarship and possibly lose their only way of paying for college. You expecting them to give up college or go deeper into student loan debts so that they can protest an injustice is an injustice to them. All you are suggesting is that even more people get hurt by this than are already hurt by it.
What do you think employment is? Strikes aren't about rules and contracts, they're about power. You don't get fired because at a certain critical mass, the bosses can't run their business without you.
And students have been risking their scholarships, enrollment, and even visas for Palestine all year. Resistance and moral stands aren't without personal risk.
I think employment is something they won't get if they don't finish college.
What is your personal risk in this? Because it's all well and good to expect other people to make sacrifices you will never have to make.
If my profession was something the NCAA cared about, I would absolutely be rallying my coworkers to take action.
There's nothing easy about striking or protesting, and there will be some people who simply can't, but you seem to just not believe in resistance at all. There is no no-risk path, but "First They Came" isn't a message about just hiding out because standing up for someone else is risky.
Again, it's all well and good for you to tell other people to take risks you don't have to take.
What risks are you taking right now?
This is a nonsense attempt at a gotcha. I have nothing to withhold from the NCAA and thus no leverage to apply. What answer would you even expect here?
I'm going to keep bringing this up, because you've no doubt heard this poem many times in your lifetime, but what do you think "They Came For" is about? Because your answer to all of this just seems to be "it's too hard, no one should do anything unless they're personally impacted". And it's good you're getting out, but you don't need to justify it by pretending no one can do anything and no one should take any risks for their fellow man.
It's not a "gotcha." You are calling for other people to take risks on your behalf. The least you can do is explain what risks you're taking. It sounds out like the answer is none.