CONCORD, N.H. —
A New Hampshire executive councilor is raising concerns about new language tied to federal highway funding.
Executive Councilor Karen Liot Hill said a new memo from the U.S. Department of Transportation indicates that it will direct more funding to states with higher birth and marriage rates.
"New Hampshire is one of the oldest states in the nation, and we have one of the lowest birth rates in the country," she said. "And so, I'm very concerned if all of a sudden, there's going to be new strings attached to federal funds."
State Department of Transportation officials said the prior administration also had its own initiatives, and New Hampshire still got its highway money.
We don't anticipate that this will cause any problems," said DOT deputy commissioner Andre Briere. "In the last Justice40 (Initiative), we're also a state that doesn't have a lot of communities that meet those criteria, but we were nonetheless granted discretionary grants."
Briere was referring to a program under President Joe Biden that prioritized programs related to climate change, clean energy, pollution reduction and other categories.
As the Trump administration's freeze on federal grants gets litigated in the courts, nonprofit organizations and other initiatives that receive federal funding are watching and waiting.
Executive Councilor John Stephen said he's all for cutting government spending, but he said that allocated funds New Hampshire organizations are counting on should be delivered.
"It's important that the nonprofits and the organizations that have been pretty much guaranteed current funding for their operations, that we continue, and we're fiscally responsible in everything we do at the state level," Stephen said. "What I'd like to see going forward, though, is that we're looking, working closely, collaboratively with the federal government to make sure that New Hampshire is not adversely impacted."
Gov. Kelly Ayotte said she hopes the Trump administration takes a closer look at where the resources being targeted by the freeze are actually going.
"Because they could be going to public safety issues," she said. "They could be going to drug prevention, interdiction – all those things are critical."
Serious question: Does anyone know if this includes, or if he is going to include, funding for USDA Mortgages? I mean, I doubt he knows they exist, but someone at the Federalist Society might know, and might tell him.
There is an NYT article floating around with a full list, and it's fucking long.
Frankly, it probably would have been easier to just list the programs that they don't want to shut down (if there are any).
They will probably try to shut down the entire USDA
It's not on the list 🎉
Lucky... I don't know if I'd count on that list being exhaustive.
Agreed. My reassurance is mild at best.