this post was submitted on 27 Jan 2025
102 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

38484 readers
495 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 34 points 2 months ago (37 children)

Not a word on Chinese models being censored in the article. What an odd omission.

It should also be pretty obvious that this is following the usual Chinese MO of using massive state subsidies to destroy the international competition with impossibly low dumping prices. We are seeing this in all sorts of sectors.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 2 months ago (16 children)

Okay... But isn't it also possible that AI is massively overvalued and this is a more reasonable price point for the technology?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Energy costs money in China too, they still have coal plants and crazy energy cutback mandates every once in a while.

The truth of the matter is that you need the user interactions from the free model to train and that value cannot be understated and if you are playing catchup, then it's a must. No one would use the Chinese model if it was a shit service.

load more comments (15 replies)
load more comments (35 replies)