this post was submitted on 11 Aug 2024
224 points (99.1% liked)

interestingasfuck

1734 readers
1 users here now

Please go to [email protected]

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

That picture is all sorts of weirdly insane.

It lists the park rangers height as nearly 2 meters, then 5ft, 9in. These are not the same thing, but okay. Then it shifts to a 3rd unit for the rest of measurments, cm. This is related to meters, but the "human scale but pervy" image we are supposed to understand doesnt use them at all. Her height should be listed as 175cm.

It then shows a towering monster of a polar bear, that is clearly at least 2x the rangers height, or roughly 4 meters. However, it lists the actual "bipedal height" of the polar bear as 270cm, or 2.7 meters, which is nowhere near 2x the park rangers height of 175cm, or 1.75 meters. That is far less grandiose of a difference than the image portrays it.

Whoever drew that was just plain wacky.