this post was submitted on 25 Jan 2025
694 points (97.9% liked)

News

36233 readers
2666 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] y0kai@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think the key here, and I'm speaking from the POV of a 12-stepper, is the idea of introspection.

Literally, all I learned from 12 step was to look at myself deeply, intensely, and with honesty; learn to forgive myself for the shitty things I've done; learn to forgive others for the shitty things they've done to me, while taking responsibility for my part in whatever that may have been; and to get into the habit of practicing those things daily.

The part I think you're missing with the quote above that you seem to be taking it literally, when in the quote itself implies that it and the idea of God in general, is to be interpreted by the reader however they see fit.

Sought through prayer and meditation to improve our conscious contact with God as we understood Him, praying only for knowledge of His will for us and the power to carry that out.

I also think that the "sought through prayer and meditation" does not necessarily imply that one must do both, as it is speaking in the first person plural. Meaning, some people may pray without "meditating", while others like myself may choose to meditate without "praying" and you can still say of the group "We prayed and meditated" without contradicting oneself. An "and/or" probably would've worked best there, but whatever.

Now, as to whether I think AA and NA are culty? Absolutely, and it's a big reason why I stopped attending.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

"And" doesn't just imply both, that's exactly what "and" means. It doesn't mean either/or, it means both. I have no idea why you're suggesting otherwise.

A ham and cheese sandwich isn't ham or cheese, it's both.
A husband and wife is always two people.
A horse and rider is not either a horse or a person riding a horse.

You must know this.

[–] y0kai@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

A ham and cheese sandwich isn’t ham or cheese, it’s both.

I agree.

When it's ham and cheese sandwiches, I personally have to ask whether the speaker means there are ham sandwiches and cheese sandwiches, or just sandwiches with ham and cheese.

ETA:

A husband and wife is always two people.

Yes, but when you say "we were husbands and wives" does this imply one person is both?

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I cannot imagine a scenario where someone says "I have ham and cheese sandwiches" and they mean two different types of sandwiches.

And I also do not believe that you are so stupid that you would think that was what they meant, so I have no idea why you're pretending to be. But if it is true, congratulations on being one of the most obnoxious people on the planet.

[–] y0kai@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Please see my edit on the comment you're replying to for a better example. I just needed a second to think about what I wanted to say.

Also, I'm autistic. So yeah, I'm probably pretty obnoxious, but at least I'm not out here just insulting people because they know from experience that language can have more than one interpretation.

edit: spelling

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

It wasn't an insult because I literally said didn't believe that about you.

That's like saying "I don't think you're a pedophile" is an insult. Autism is not an excuse to not know the difference between an insult and the literal opposite of an insult.

[–] y0kai@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

if it is true, congratulations on being one of the most obnoxious people on the planet.

It was true. You just called me "one of the most obnoxious people on the planet."

Autism is not an excuse to not know the difference between an insult and the literal opposite of an insult.

It is.

the literal opposite of an insult.

Thank you for the complement?

I'm done here and I hope you have a day.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Got it, you don't know what "if" means. And no, it is not, many members of my family, including my daughter, are autistic. They do not use their autism as an excuse to get away with pretending people said the opposite of what they said.

In fact, every autistic member of my family knows how to say, "I'm sorry, I misunderstood what you said." They do not use their autism as an excuse. You know who does? Elon Musk. If he even is actually autistic.

[–] y0kai@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Look if I've done something to upset you, then I do apologize. That's almost never my goal in life.

That said, I know exactly what "if" means.

You made an assumption and appended an insult to the opposite side of that assumption. You were wrong in your assumption, thereby lobbing that insult at me. I won't apologize for being insulted.

As for the sandwich nonsense. Two things:

EDIT lol i hit tab and enter on accident and it posted.

  1. That situation and many others have happened to me. I usually clear up the misunderstanding, so I can figure out wth is going on, and then apologize, though I probably shouldn't have to seeing as asking clarifying questions is not something that really needs to be apologized for.

  2. You still haven't addressed the husband and wives thing. Was that a good point so you're ignoring it and changing the subject to my understanding of sandwich ingredients?

Regardless, as I said in my last comment. I don't really want to continue this conversation. I feel as if you're acting in bad faith and would appreciate being left alone so I don't have to block you.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No. It's not a good point. If someone said "husband and wives," the vast, vast majority of people on this planet understand that to be polygamy.

And other than you, I have yet to meet anyone who thinks that and means or.

[–] y0kai@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But thats not what I wrote. Husbands is also plural.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

That still doesn't change and to or. And will never mean or.