this post was submitted on 19 Jan 2025
717 points (97.1% liked)

Greentext

7938 readers
610 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Zwiebel@feddit.org 54 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Assuming OOP said 'retarded', that doesn't fit their message well does it?

[–] Ummdustry@sh.itjust.works 44 points 1 year ago (1 children)

it's called context switching, within 4chan the r-word is an honorific rather than a slur.

[–] AlexisFR@jlai.lu 20 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

There is nothing wrong with the word "retard", don't let corporations push their double speak.

[–] yeahiknow3@lemmings.world 26 points 1 year ago

Americans and their hatred of random words. Lmao.

[–] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I’ve grappled with “retard” & “bitch” (made a thread about it a couple months ago too, trying to form/reform my opinion).

Clearly we have to be careful with any messages industry pushes. With that said -

What do you think about these statements from Special Olympians?

CC: @yeahiknow3@lemmings.world

[–] yeahiknow3@lemmings.world 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

I appreciate your good faith response. I see and empathize with your perspective. To play devil’s advocate, you can’t control whether a group of people decide, out of the blue, to internalize hurtful language that isn’t aimed at them. The N-word had a very specific target and a very cruel purpose. The word “retard” did not. It basically has the same vernacular trajectory as “moron,” or “idiot.” From medical diagnosis to non-specific pejorative. Why aren’t those synonyms verboten? Because people like to make things about themselves.

[–] dragonfucker@lemmy.nz 0 points 1 year ago

It comes from the medical diagnosis "mental retardation". It was designed from the beginning to target disabled people.

[–] AlexisFR@jlai.lu 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That is true, if you use it against disabled poeple. I only use it against moronic able poeple who should know better.

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 year ago

Honestly, that's maybe worse. If you're using it to say something bad about someone else, that means it's a bad thing and should be condemned. The people who it is actually meant to apply to (in its original meaning) then see them, as a group, as a thing that is insulting to even be associated with.

It's wild how hard critical thought is for some people while discussing a word about intelligence...

[–] glimse@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago (2 children)

This post reminded me of that old Louis CK bit on not liking the term "N Word" because it transfer the burden of saying the actual word from the speaker to the listener's brain

[–] jballs@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago

Louis CK's bit on the word "retarded" is pretty damn good too.

[–] rickyrigatoni@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Joke's on him my brain is always saying it 😎

[–] crowbar@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] rickyrigatoni@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

Speaking sumerian.

[–] chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 year ago