this post was submitted on 18 Jan 2025
104 points (99.1% liked)

Hardware

6058 readers
112 users here now

All things related to technology hardware, with a focus on computing hardware.


Some other hardware communities across Lemmy:


Rules (Click to Expand):

  1. Follow the Lemmy.world Rules - https://mastodon.world/about

  2. Be kind. No bullying, harassment, racism, sexism etc. against other users.

  3. No Spam, illegal content, or NSFW content.

  4. Please stay on topic, adjacent topics (e.g. software) are fine if they are strongly relevant to technology hardware. Another example would be business news for hardware-focused companies.

  5. Please try and post original sources when possible (as opposed to summaries).

  6. If posting an archived version of the article, please include a URL link to the original article in the body of the post.


Icon by "icon lauk" under CC BY 3.0

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] viking@infosec.pub 29 points 1 year ago (5 children)

I don't understand why anyone needs a software to achieve this in the first place? I've hooked the camera's HDMI out to some cheap random USB-C HDMI capture card, and use OBS to record the stream. Easy, uncompressed, no restrictions to whichever settings their software lets you access.

[–] blargbluuk@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 year ago

You're kinda explaining Canon's logic here though - they want you to pay for "convenience".

[–] Tangent5280@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

So the $5 is the idiot tax then - for people that can't figure it out themselves. Scummy as fuck when they could just out a youtube tutorial instead.

[–] Damage@feddit.it 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Can you use that in videocalling apps?

[–] viking@infosec.pub 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I guess it depends on the app, but I just checked and both Skype and Teams show me the capture card as input source, and the preview picture looks fine. So I'm pretty sure it works in an actual call, though I haven't tried it yet.

Both apps heavily compress the video signal though, even if you set the quality to 1080p, so I doubt it makes a huge difference compared to a regular webcam.

[–] Damage@feddit.it 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The advantage of a camera is the lens, not the resolution

[–] viking@infosec.pub 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

For a video call, I'm not sure that really matters a whole lot, but I guess that depends on the use case.

[–] gazter@aussie.zone 1 points 1 year ago

It's easier to market based on hard numbers like resolution, so people are used to big res number = more better, but if that high res sensor is capturing a crap image, you're going to get a crap image. Garbage in, garbage out.

[–] Akasazh@feddit.nl 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

There is a vitrual cam for OBS that spoofs the OBS output to a webcam you can use in zoom/teams/etc

I used a lot during covid.

https://obsproject.com/forum/resources/obs-virtualcam.949/

[–] gazter@aussie.zone 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's essentially the same thing, but instead of paying for software, you're using more complicated free software, and paying for the hardware.

[–] viking@infosec.pub 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The hardware cost me less than 5 bucks.

[–] gazter@aussie.zone 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's gotta be pretty jank. If I'm trying to connect a pro-sumer camera like in the article, I'd want the connection to be quality. Pro-sumer capture cards start at around $300.

[–] viking@infosec.pub 1 points 1 year ago

I have a high end Canon myself, and the card does an excellent job. I bought it while living in China though, tech there costs a fraction of what you pay in the US.

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

a software

That word doesn't work like that.