this post was submitted on 12 Jan 2025
139 points (93.2% liked)

Fediverse memes

2375 readers
40 users here now

Memes about the Fediverse.

Rules

General
  1. Be respectful
  2. Post on topic
  3. No bigotry or hate speech
  4. Memes should not be personal attacks towards other users
Specific
  1. We are not YPTB. If you have a problem with the way an instance or community is run, then take it up over at !yepowertrippinbastards@lemmy.dbzer0.com.

Elsewhere in the Fediverse

Other relevant communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Blaze@feddit.org 5 points 11 months ago (4 children)

They could change the name to LessCars, would seem less agressive

[–] BradleyUffner@lemmy.world 20 points 11 months ago (1 children)

They have no interest in appearing less aggressive. Getting to be aggressive is like the highlight of their day.

[–] Blaze@feddit.org 7 points 11 months ago

Hopefully a less agressive community can emerge. There is actually !publictransport@slrpnk.net

[–] Nemo@slrpnk.net 12 points 11 months ago (2 children)

The name isn't "no cars" or "never cars". There are some rare use cases for personal automobiles. But the ways cars operate in our society today? Fuck 'em.

[–] Blaze@feddit.org 13 points 11 months ago (1 children)

US society (IIRC you're a US citizen) definitely is car centric. The issue people have with FuckCars is how it puts the responsibility of the situation to the cars (and their owners) rather than the policies leading to that situation.

!publictransport@slrpnk.net could maybe a less "fuck them" alternative

[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 13 points 11 months ago (2 children)

But !fuckcars@lemmy.world isn't just about public transport. It's also about cycling. And walking. And building cities such that walking or cycling are actually viable, not just because there are good bike paths/footpaths, but also because paths are well-shaded, roads are narrow and easy to cross, and the distances you have to travel are lower because density is higher and localities are mixed-use with local businesses. It's about all the ways that motonormativity is shit.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago
[–] Blaze@feddit.org 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Hence !FewerCars

[–] SplashJackson@lemmy.ca 3 points 11 months ago

Right up the tailpipe!

[–] Emperor@feddit.uk 10 points 11 months ago (2 children)
[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 9 points 11 months ago (2 children)

No. Every car should be reduced by 10% annually.

[–] Emperor@feddit.uk 7 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I misread that as "anally", but that would do too.

[–] alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml 8 points 11 months ago

!dragonsFuckingCars@pawb.social

[–] BradleyUffner@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

Xeno's automobile!

[–] Blaze@feddit.org 5 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Well spotted, as you know English isn't my first language 😅

[–] Emperor@feddit.uk 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Oh indeed, it's a classic pedant's gotcha that I didn't think you'd mind.

[–] Blaze@feddit.org 2 points 11 months ago

Definitely not!

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

But they're incredibly aggressive, so the current name fits them better