this post was submitted on 12 Jan 2025
917 points (96.9% liked)

196

18669 readers
840 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.


Rule: You must post before you leave.



Other rules

Behavior rules:

Posting rules:

NSFW: NSFW content is permitted but it must be tagged and have content warnings. Anything that doesn't adhere to this will be removed. Content warnings should be added like: [penis], [explicit description of sex]. Non-sexualized breasts of any gender are not considered inappropriate and therefore do not need to be blurred/tagged.

If you have any questions, feel free to contact us on our matrix channel or email.

Other 196's:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
917
rule (lemmy.blahaj.zone)
submitted 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) by hungryphrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone to c/196@lemmy.blahaj.zone
 

Guys, at this rate I don't think the revolution's going to happen anytime soon.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] kittenzrulz123@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 11 months ago (13 children)

As a leftist its also important to keep in mind we do differentiate between leftists who hold some opinions we disagree with compared to a Liberal who disagrees with us on nearly everything. Especially when said Liberals demand to be treated like leftists yet support imperalism, genocide, apartheid, capitalism, bigotry, and yet constantly call people "fake leftists" or "tankies".

[–] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 35 points 11 months ago (3 children)

You had me until "tankies". Tankies are scum and don't need defending.

[–] Hegar@fedia.io 27 points 11 months ago (1 children)

It's not about defending tankies it's about people who are constantly shifting the focus of conversation to the most mockable section of online lefties.

The ruling class don't waste their time distancing themselves from qanon, they focus on furthering their class interests and emiserating the poor.

Liberals who are constantly calling people tankies are helping the ruling class.

[–] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 9 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

I'm not taking cues from the far-right in not denouncing our worst aspects when I see them and letting them take up shop in our spaces. I don't see the need to whataboutism to them either and will call that out, but I don't want them in spaces I'm in either.

[–] princessnorah@lemmy.blahaj.zone 22 points 11 months ago (1 children)

No one's defending tankies, nor saying we shouldn't call them out. The original commenter was saying liberals call all manner of leftists "tankies" when they actually aren't in order to derail them.

[–] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)

The next commenter stated: "The ruling class don’t waste their time distancing themselves from qanon, they focus on furthering their class interests and emiserating the poor." Distancing themselves includes calling them out. So it sounds to me like they're saying we need to be pragmatic like the ruling class and not distance ourselves from tankies, which is absolutely not something I'm ever going to do for those slimeballs. Actively doing it like some sort of performance apropos of nothing? Sure, maybe not. But if a tankie ever tries to associate with us, they need to be given the boot over their disgusting ideals.

[–] Hegar@fedia.io 9 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I'm saying the need to instantly and constantly denounce tankies is tedious and counterproductive. I'm saying that policing the boundaries of leftism based on dumb shit said online is a reactionary distraction.

[–] hark@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago

It's a common strategy used to distract from the core issues. It's like when supporters of israel go "but do you condemn hamas?!" or "oh, I notice you don't criticize hamas as much (therefore you must support them)"

[–] princessnorah@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

I feel like you thought they were disagreeing with you, when they were pointing out the hypocrisy of Liberals but I dunno...

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] A_Union_of_Kobolds@lemmy.world 11 points 11 months ago (1 children)

And how do we do that?

This is the internet, everyone is as anonymous as they want to be. Lots of people find these posts by browsing by All, so they're not likely to be aware of (or care about) the rules for a particular instance. If a Liberal and a Leftist wander into the same community, it can be hard to tell them apart unless they've made politics their whole identity.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] verdare@beehaw.org 7 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Maybe I’m in a bubble, but I have yet to see anyone who’s not genuinely a tankie being accused of such.

[–] kittenzrulz123@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Ive seen people be called tankies for not supporting Kamala and opposing Liberal Democracy

[–] verdare@beehaw.org 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

for not supporting Kamala

That’s wild. I’ve never heard that take and have a difficult time believing that it is common.

opposing Liberal Democracy

What alternative were they in favor of?

[–] kittenzrulz123@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 11 months ago (1 children)

That’s wild. I’ve never heard that take and have a difficult time believing that it is common.

World users were literally calling anyone who critiqued Kamala Russian bots, were you not paying attention for the last several months?

What alternative were they in favor of?

Depends, some leftists support a workers democracy, im personally an Anarcho Syndicalist

[–] verdare@beehaw.org 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

World users

Ah. I think I see where the problem is. I believe my instance defederated from lemmy.world a while back.

[–] kittenzrulz123@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 11 months ago

You arent missing out on much

[–] 0ops@lemm.ee 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I've seen conservatives lob the word tankie around before like they do with other scary sounding political words. But not here on lemmy. "Tankie" has a very precise meaning on lemmy that everyone here seems to understand, despite a few tankies trying to gaslight people into thinking the term has "lost it's meaning".

[–] humanspiral@lemmy.ca 1 points 11 months ago (2 children)

For those who don't know what it means, what is "clear definition of tankie"?

[–] Umbrias@beehaw.org 5 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)

someone who claims to be leftist but tacitly or gleefully supports authoritarianism, imperialism, or violent repression. Many are easily identifiable by their pointing to places that are not The West™️ and smoothing over, apologizing for, or denying, blatant horrors on the basis that they are unfriendly with the west. sometimes called red fascists.

It's actually important to ostracize these people as they are obviously the most blatant opportunists in leftist movements looking to implement authoritarian repressive regimes.

[–] humanspiral@lemmy.ca 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

claims to be leftist but tacitly or gleefully supports authoritarianism, imperialism, or violent repression.

including those resisting US evil? Not supporting a war on Russia is tankie, because being too stupid to not understand we the people lose, and Russia needs to defend itself, is not as important as believing US propaganda that Russian leadership is evil for defending itself?

[–] Umbrias@beehaw.org 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

on the brightside ya'll normally just can't resist outing yourselves.

[–] humanspiral@lemmy.ca 1 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Is there a name for leftists that believe everyone deserves every war the US tells them is a "strategic imperative"? Even the ones where they use motivated nazis and very illiberal Islamist rulers?

[–] Umbrias@beehaw.org 2 points 11 months ago
[–] NuclearDolphin@lemmy.ml 1 points 11 months ago

yes. "Western leftist"

[–] volodya_ilich@lemm.ee 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Spoken like a true lib who hasn't grabbed a history book in their lives. You have done exactly ZERO study of this so-called "authoritarianism", its characteristics, actual comparisons with western systems, and the reasons for certain degrees of oppression in different systems. Your entire analysis is vibes-based, and doesn't hold up to the slightest scrutiny, and leads you to being on the side of the US Department of State propaganda on 99% of occasions. Remember, people called us tankies 20 years ago for opposing the invasion of Iraq, because "Saddam is a rabid dog".

[–] Umbrias@beehaw.org 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

really searching for straws to grasp here eh?

[–] volodya_ilich@lemm.ee 1 points 11 months ago (3 children)

"I'm a leftist, and I proudly support 0 historical leftist movements which actually achieved anything"

[–] Umbrias@beehaw.org 2 points 11 months ago (10 children)

wild leaps of logic, care to show your work? i could use entertainment

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] 0ops@lemm.ee 4 points 11 months ago

In a nutshell, alternative-imperialists with a leftist bent. They're hypocrites. "Imperialism is evil...with these exceptions, those empires are cool".

It's frustrating trying to talk with tankies, because really I agree with practically all of their criticisms of the US and a few criticisms of NATO and the West at large. But then that gets turned around into a justification for X formerly-socialist country drafting soldiers to invade sovereign country "Y" with practically unanimous resistance, and I just don't see how the hell that's supposed to help the working class of either state.

[–] HelloHotel@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

It's a strange state of affairs, there is a right wing recruitment pipeline deticated to making fun of liberals for being "cringe but also wrong"™.

An interesting experament you can do, replace "leftist", "the left" and "liberal" with "SJW" (swap the insider and outsider language) and ask yourself how much and in what interesting ways does the sentimate of the post change.

[–] volodya_ilich@lemm.ee 3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Damn SJWs supporting checks notes imperialism, bigotry and capitalism

[–] HelloHotel@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Interesting, highly synthetic (in this case right wing "Woke SJW") propaganda becomes clearly fraudulent when material complaints like yours arise.

load more comments (9 replies)