this post was submitted on 11 Jan 2025
413 points (99.3% liked)

News

36480 readers
2530 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] anarchrist@lemmy.dbzer0.com 30 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Counterpoint: if he becomes a political prisoner, a ton of libs get radicalized

[–] Snowclone@lemmy.world 74 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Unfortunately there's a limit to ''rilled up'' for intelligent people, because eventually you just stop engaging with politics because you need to survive and paying attention is fucking exhausting.

[–] anarchrist@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Eh I'm open to getting a little stupid. Hmu

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

When you live paycheck-to-paycheck, as nearly half of Americans do, taking to the streets means possibly starving your kids.

I don't know if this is by design, but it sure as hell helps people in power.

[–] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 year ago

I feel bad that I feel like this

[–] Saleh@feddit.org -1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Often fighting is the smartest thing to do. Not fighting is not a sign of intelligence.

[–] Snowclone@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Yes. A rush and a push and the land that we stand on is ours. But it's FUCKING EXHAUSTING to try and get everyone else to show up and care. They hardly ever will. I put a lot of effort into the Sanders campaign. Fuck tons of engagement and groundswell, all the buzz was buzzing. Those fucks NEVER SHOWED UP TO VOTE ON VOTE DAY!! I don't know how or why or have any analysis to point to. It's just fucking exhausting.

[–] fine_sandy_bottom@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

What a silly thing to say. In some very rare instances, that most people will never encounter in their lives, fighting is the smartest thing to do. In all other cases it's probably the dumbest thing to do.

[–] Saleh@feddit.org 1 points 1 year ago

I would say most people had a bully attempt to see if they can bully them in school or other places. And those who fought back made it clear bullying them is costly and got peace. Those who gave in got years of harassment.

Going out of your way to use violence is often stupid, or having it as your only resort to handle a conflict. But categorically excluding it is often very stupid and at best a sign of an privileged life, where the privileges acted as a shield from violence.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

I think this depends on how "fighting" is defined. "Fighting the system" can be done in all sorts of ways, many of them not involving anything violent or even illegal. I think what Saleh is saying is that people who have no urge to get engaged are being fools.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Do you know how many times I've heard, "if X happens, it will radicalize the people and they will take to the streets" and then X happens and it doesn't?

Because I'll give you one huge as fuck reminder: the end of Roe v. Wade.

Women across the country became second-class citizens overnight and it sure didn't bring about any sort of glorious revolution.

Expecting Americans to get radicalized by him getting arrested compared to that seems a bit silly to me.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago

“But the one great shocking occasion, when tens or hundreds or thousands will join with you, never comes. That’s the difficulty. If the last and worst act of the whole regime had come immediately after the first and smallest, thousands, yes, millions would have been sufficiently shocked—if, let us say, the gassing of the Jews in ’43 had come immediately after the ‘German Firm’ stickers on the windows of non-Jewish shops in ’33. But of course this isn’t the way it happens. In between come all the hundreds of little steps, some of them imperceptible, each of them preparing you not to be shocked by the next. Step C is not so much worse than Step B, and, if you did not make a stand at Step B, why should you at Step C? And so on to Step D.

And one day, too late, your principles, if you were ever sensible of them, all rush in upon you. The burden of self-deception has grown too heavy, and some minor incident, in my case my little boy, hardly more than a baby, saying ‘Jewish swine,’ collapses it all at once, and you see that everything, everything, has changed and changed completely under your nose. The world you live in—your nation, your people—is not the world you were born in at all. The forms are all there, all untouched, all reassuring, the houses, the shops, the jobs, the mealtimes, the visits, the concerts, the cinema, the holidays. But the spirit, which you never noticed because you made the lifelong mistake of identifying it with the forms, is changed. Now you live in a world of hate and fear, and the people who hate and fear do not even know it themselves; when everyone is transformed, no one is transformed. Now you live in a system which rules without responsibility even to God. The system itself could not have intended this in the beginning, but in order to sustain itself it was compelled to go all the way.”

― Milton Sanford Mayer, They Thought They Were Free: The Germans 1933-45

[–] grue@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

"Radicalized libs" is an oxymoron. "Radicalized leftists," sure, but "libs" are centrist (if not center-right) by definition.

Edit: I should've said "moderate" rather than "centrist," as my point was more about this sort of thing than pinning down exactly where libs fit on the political spectrum.