this post was submitted on 11 Jul 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)

World News

47507 readers
2040 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Nato members have pledged their support for an "irreversible path" to future membership for Ukraine, as well as more aid.

While a formal timeline for it to join the military alliance was not agreed at a summit in Washington DC, the military alliance's 32 members said they had "unwavering" support for Ukraine's war effort.

Nato has also announced further integration with Ukraine's military and members have committed €40bn ($43.3bn, £33.7bn) in aid in the next year, including F-16 fighter jets and air defence support.

The bloc's Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg said: "Support to Ukraine is not charity - it is in our own security interest."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] WanderingVentra@lemm.ee -1 points 11 months ago (2 children)

It would definitely weaken a ton although I doubt it would immediately dissolve, although its power is heavily based on our leadership and military and anyone who doesn't see that is pretty naive. Hopefully Europe would help Ukraine enough to make up for us having Trump and probably not helping them anymore, though.

[–] Freefall@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Probably not helping them? You mean against a trump US joining the Russians. The dude really wants us on the evil side of WW3.

[–] WanderingVentra@lemm.ee -1 points 11 months ago

He could remove aid but I doubt he could convince Congress and the American people to help Russia. Plus, his whole pro-Russia thing with respect to the war has been posed as an isolation thing. Maybe I'm wrong, though. He's not afraid to be a hypocrite. A Trump candidacy is depressing and I've been trying not to dwell on the possibility of it tbh.

[–] Maalus@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] WanderingVentra@lemm.ee -1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

It wasn't a good question nor was it asked in good faith. I answered what I could with some context. It's like asking if we know the world would have no wars after we got rid of the Nazis and all the evil in the world would disappear. Well, no, obviously not, but that it doesn't mean it wouldn't improve things.

[–] Maalus@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

It was a regular question that doesn't fit within your narrow view of "US bad everybody evil because puppets of US"

[–] WanderingVentra@lemm.ee -1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Okay, that's quite the straw man, but now I get your confusion, because you're making up arguments you think I'm making. I never said "everybody evil because puppets of US".

I made a single sentence criticizing NATO (because often America is bad believe it or not and they're the main superpower behind it). Everything else you're assuming or making up. People can believe other non-US countries, including Russia or China or other Western countries, can be bad, can support Ukraine in their war against Russia, and still think that NATO is an arm of US imperialism. Some people are capable of holding these multiple non-conflicting thoughts in their head at the same time. It's not whataboutism, because it's related to NATO the whole topic of this thread, it's just adding to the conversation and exploring the nuance of it all. But I forgot that NATO and the US can do no wrong and is a perfect angel at all times, so that's my fault for saying anything. Would you feel better if I said Western imperialism so it wasn't so specific to the US, though?

[–] Maalus@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

No you said "Nato is an arm of american imperialism" which literally means "everybody evil because puppets of US".

[–] WanderingVentra@lemm.ee -1 points 11 months ago

That's a huge simplification of what that means. But if you're going to deny the long history of NATO being an extension of American power and a way to legitimize their military conflicts around the world from Libya to Iraq, then there isn't really anywhere to go next in this conversation.