this post was submitted on 06 Jan 2025
121 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

41013 readers
475 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Musk posted last night that the platform’s algorithm will soon “promote more informational/entertaining content” in order to “maximize unregretted user-seconds.” In response to Musk changing the X algorithm, people asked Grok what is considered "negative" and were told as reported by user Leah McElrath:

• Criticism of the government

• Commentary about misinformation

• Suggestion the public is being manipulated

• Attacks against powerful people or institutions

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] IllNess@infosec.pub 38 points 11 months ago (2 children)

He works for the USA. The government isn't allowed to hinder free speech ESPECIALLY criticism of the government. That's the main reason why it was there in the first place.

Why did Jimmy Carter sell his peanut farm but Elon Musk get's to keep his propaganda machine?

[–] jmcs@discuss.tchncs.de 34 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Because Jimmy Carter wasn't perfect but at least he tried to do the right thing. Then Reagan came and it became clear the abyss has no bottom, so the absolute sociopaths have an overwhelming advantage on the political space even if they pillage everything in sight.

[–] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 15 points 11 months ago

the republicans have been criminalising free speech for decades