this post was submitted on 28 Dec 2024
283 points (91.0% liked)

News

35703 readers
2867 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Joe Biden regrets having pulled out of this year’s presidential race and believes he would have defeated Donald Trump in last month’s election – despite negative poll indications, White House sources have said.

The US president has reportedly also said he made a mistake in choosing Merrick Garland as attorney general – reflecting that Garland, a former US appeals court judge, was slow to prosecute Donald Trump for his role in the 6 January 2021 insurrection while presiding over a justice department that aggressively prosecuted Biden’s son Hunter.

With just more than three weeks of his single-term presidency remaining, Biden’s reported rueful reflections are revealed in a Washington Post profile that contains the clearest signs yet that he thinks he erred in withdrawing his candidacy in July after a woeful debate performance against his rival for the White House, Trump, the previous month.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] aaron@lemm.ee 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The only reason he ran at all is that he originally thought he had the best chance of winning

I think the whole premise is wrong. It's becoming clearer that the reason he insisted on running (despite much internal push-back) was to hold onto power for himself. It had less to do with the stakes than it did with his self-serving desires. You'd have to be completely senile to think you could beat Trump after that debate performance and all of the context surrounding it. He's STILL insisting that he could have won. On what planet? Let's assume he knows what's at stake.

[–] Serinus@lemmy.world -4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Is that easier for you than "he's a good person who tried his best and failed"?

[–] aaron@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago

Tried his best to... what? Drop out and let someone else more likely to win try for it? Doesn't seem like he wanted that. And nobody here thinks Biden would be worse than Trump. But that's not how American politics work. This is a reality show.

[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I'm very much not willing to say "he's a good person", whether or not he could have won again. Supports genocide, breaks strikes, and throws trans people under the bus after promising to protect them. He's an evil shitty person, whose interests sometimes aligned with helping the general public.

[–] Serinus@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It sure is easier to sit on the sidelines than it is to actually lead. He absolutely wasn't perfect, but I absolutely believe he tried to represent the American people to the best of his ability.

[–] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 year ago

It sure is easier to sit on the sidelines than it is to actually lead.

Like Biden!