this post was submitted on 26 Dec 2024
831 points (98.8% liked)

politics

30941 readers
2257 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Elon Musk faced backlash from his followers on X after advocating for importing “super talented engineers” to address a shortage in the U.S. tech industry.

Musk likened hiring top foreign talent to building a championship sports team and argues that there is a shortage of talented and motivated American engineers.

Critics argued there’s sufficient U.S. talent being overlooked or underpaid, with some pointing to widespread tech layoffs.

Musk dismissed claims of low wages or training gaps, maintaining a need for exceptional engineering talent to advance innovation.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] sp3tr4l@lemmy.zip 42 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (3 children)

Yeah, he just wants more pliant and subservient H1B visa holders that he can pay less than he'd have to offer to an American, who will be deported after 2 months if they don't work hard enough to satisfy him.

Oh. Right.

By 'deported', I guess we're now talking about 'rounded up into mass concentration camps.'

[–] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 34 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I had a friend back a few years ago who was an H1B and it's fucking exploitive. They made him work off his visa. And since his visa is tied to his job he couldn't leave it. The place was toxic af.

The company was very much abusing H1B visas but unless someone at the company spoke up, it's just business.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 14 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The place was toxic af.

What I've seen at such places is that they will often put some Indian into a management position and they will squeeze blood from a stone like you wouldn't believe, flogging H1Bs (all Indian in many cases), and hiring no citizens if they can help it, other than just a token or two.

But the tokens will quickly learn their job is under constant threat if they get any notions of being uppity - the Indian H1Bs being there as a lesson that doesn't have to really be explained....

And yeah, it's toxic as anything.

[–] SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Even worse when the company exploits the caste system. Since most Indian migrants still believe in that shit.

[–] sp3tr4l@lemmy.zip 13 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I used to contract at MSFT back during the 360 3RR era, me and my boss were reworking the support phone tree process flow, because it was wholly inadequate and had many infinite loops that a caller and support agent would end up in...

But yeah, during that, I routinely saw Indian H1B contractors being viciously abused by their higher ups in the caste system who were full time employees.

I tried to call out some of this, and HR's line was literally that it was not politically correct of me to criticize this, because well thats just normal in their culture.

Its fucking disgusting.

MSFT has an entire company culture of its own caste system of various kind of contractors who are basically all lied to by recruiters telling them if they work really hard they'll become full time employees with much better pay and benefits... in reality, that almost never happens, because project managers are all full time, and will routinely sabotage their own projects if the alternative is to actually keep a team on long enough that they'd become full time.

As a recent example of what I mean by this:

Halo Infinite.

MSFT hired a whole team of temp contractors to overhaul the engine that Halo ran on, to massively upgrade it.

By the time significant Halo Infinite production began, basically all of these people who rewrote the engine now were on to some new contract, some other company.

So... nobody in the actual main game dev team can figure out how the overhauled engine (now called SlipSpace) works, they can't ask any of its actual devs for help, they spend a few years trying to develop the game on it, game is buggy as fuck and difficult to work on... and eventually give up and start redoing everything on UE5.

This all happened because MSFT higher ups wanted to penny pinch the development of the foundation of their biggest IPs next game, by using contractors instead of higher paid FTs, and in the end, it cost them enormous amounts of time an money on something they ended up abandoning anyway.

(I mean, there's much more to the story of why Halo Infinite's development was fucked, such as totally rewriting the story of the game midway through development, but the dumpster fire with the engine development is almost entirely due to MSFTs temp vs FT caste system and short term cost avoidant, thus long term cost maximizing management culture.)

[–] HK65@sopuli.xyz 1 points 2 years ago

Surely it's that the ones in the minority believing that promote each other and make everyone else's life hell.

[–] conditional_soup@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago

Holy shit, is this why California's ban on the caste system failed? Because companies are leveraging it against H1Bs?

[–] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 10 points 2 years ago

By 'deported', I guess we're now talking about '~~rounded up into mass concentration camps~~ being administratively relocated to alternative living accommodations.