this post was submitted on 24 Dec 2024
101 points (95.5% liked)
News
166 readers
1 users here now
Anything related to the news. We will not abuse our mod power to censor you like the other news communities.
founded 4 months ago
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Based on the evidence, I'd say he's not guilty.
The weirdest part to me would be why he'd write a manifesto to "save the police time" and then not plead guilty
If you want a trial, you have to plead not guilty. Otherwise, it just goes to sentencing, which would be done in a few weeks.
Pleading not guilty, he'll be in the news every couple weeks, inspiring universal healthcare legislation, candidates, and/or copycats.
This.
Besides the media play that this will get, jury nullification is still a thing. Even when killing is wrong, it's possible to convince a jury of his peers that killing one CEO has saved thousands of people.