this post was submitted on 22 Dec 2024
-1 points (45.5% liked)

Socialism

5794 readers
16 users here now

Rules TBD.

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
-1
submitted 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) by fxdave@lemmy.ml to c/socialism@lemmy.ml
 

Correct me if I'm wrong.

Afaik, liberalism ambiguously meant both advocacy for human rights and an economic system. To avoid this confusion, the economic system has been moved out as libertarianism.

For example, accessibility improvements of government buildings is a liberal movement.

Minimizing the control over capitalism is a libertarian movement.

There's also so called "liberals" which is not more than a hate speech. We are not "conservatives" or "liberals" in every topic.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] fxdave@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 months ago

How about this one?

Modern liberals have held that freedom can also be threatened by private economic actors, such as businesses, that exploit workers or dominate governments, and they advocate state action

source: https://www.britannica.com/question/How-does-classical-liberalism-differ-from-modern-liberalism

(You are right about private property, I meant personal property)