Socialism

5789 readers

32 users here now

Rules TBD.

founded 6 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

-1

Liberalism vs Libertarianism (lemmy.ml)

submitted 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

5 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Correct me if I'm wrong.

Afaik, liberalism ambiguously meant both advocacy for human rights and an economic system. To avoid this confusion, the economic system has been moved out as libertarianism.

For example, accessibility improvements of government buildings is a liberal movement.

Minimizing the control over capitalism is a libertarian movement.

There's also so called "liberals" which is not more than a hate speech. We are not "conservatives" or "liberals" in every topic.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

I think what you linked is its old meaning.

Any socialist worth their salt considers liberalism to be the ideology of capitalism, and as I just showed, Wikipedia agrees. As does ProleWiki: https://en.prolewiki.org/wiki/Liberalism

At least, private property exists in socialism too.

I think you may be conflating personal property with private property. I just showed you in Wikipedia’s definition for socialism that socialists are against private property, because it is very basis of capitalism.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

How about this one?

Modern liberals have held that freedom can also be threatened by private economic actors, such as businesses, that exploit workers or dominate governments, and they advocate state action

source: https://www.britannica.com/question/How-does-classical-liberalism-differ-from-modern-liberalism

(You are right about private property, I meant personal property)