this post was submitted on 18 Dec 2024
79 points (75.5% liked)

News

36201 readers
2553 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] HappycamperNZ@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I cant, because it didn't happen (these ideas were implemented) and therefore its evidence of poverty increasing by not putting them in place doesn't exist.

What I can give you is the known and proven link between between income, spending, GDP and inflation, which is a combination of Okuns law and the Phillips curve. Both of which have been used by pretty much every country to control inflation since the Great depression- which happened because these wernt known and applied.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You made the claim. If you can't back it up, it's a worthless claim. Either they would have been in poverty regardless as you claimed, in which case you can back that up, or libertarian policies hurt people.

I'm going with the latter until you can show me some evidence.

[–] HappycamperNZ@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The fact I can show you the two key economic laws that address inflation, and the effects that a triple digit inflation rate has on a country and its population, and that you consider that not evidence tells me you are about 6 weeks of tertiary education short of knowing what you are actually talking about. I can link you the damn text book if thats good enough evidence, but I doubt that you would consider an internationally recognized and developed, peer reviewed document as evidence.

For the record - im not calling you stupid or uneducated. I suspect you actually give a shit about people and are blinded to the fact that reality doesn't give a shit about feelings and being nice. You're argument is the same as saying that a starving population shouldn't be made to work a fallow farm to feed themselves and others because its putting more pressure on them. They will starve regardless - but this gives a way out.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

And people can show you economic "laws" that counter them, because there's absolutely no such consensus about economics.

Saying I'm uneducated and then saying you're not calling me uneducated doesn't make much sense either.

Also, saying someone is uneducated because they don't agree with libertarian economic theories is peak libertarian. Good job.

[–] HappycamperNZ@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think its your turn to pony up some evidence to support your claims - manipulating GDP to offset inflation is done by virtually every country. You disagree, and state that other economic theory disagrees. What ones, and where was it applied?

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I very much did provide evidence for my claims. You have yet to provide any evidence that Milei's cruel libertarian policies were the only way to bring down inflation or even the best way.