this post was submitted on 08 Jul 2024
11 points (100.0% liked)

Traditional Art

6148 readers
129 users here now

From dabblers to masters, obscure to popular and ancient to futuristic, this is an inclusive community dedicated to showcasing all types of art by all kinds of artists, as long as they're made in a traditional medium

'Traditional' here means 'Physical', as in artworks which are NON-DIGITAL in nature.

What's allowed: Acrylic, Pastel, Encaustic, Gouache, Oil and Watercolor Paintings; Ink Illustrations; Manga Panels; Pencil and Charcoal sketches; Collages; Etchings; Lithographs; Wood Prints; Pottery; Ceramics; Metal, Wire and paper sculptures; Tapestry; weaving; Qulting; Wood carvings, Armor Crafting and more.

What's not allowed: Digital art (anything made with Photoshop, Clip Studio Paint, Krita, Blender, GIMP or other art programs) or AI art (anything made with Stable Diffusion, Midjourney or other models)


make sure to check the rules stickied to the top of the community before posting.


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Moops@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Because not everyone has had the experiences and education we have. Perhaps we should take the opportunity to educate rather than to shame.

[–] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

They said, while blatantly highroading

Fine though, your point stands. I'm not here to bicker, it just seems like the subtlety here is not exactly asking much sensitivity from its audience

[–] anyhow2503@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm not here to bicker

You came out fucking swinging. There's no need to act like you weren't looking for some kind of confrontation.

[–] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Chalk it up to cultural differences. I've explained myself elsewhere in this thread to the best of my ability, if unlikeability ever deserves to be explained.

[–] Doof@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

unlikability is certainly the right word.

[–] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You are worried I might have overlooked it. Kind of you, but please do not trouble yourself.

[–] Doof@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Im sure you already know you’re unlikable - not a bother at all.

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm not here to bicker

Yes you are.

[–] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Okay. I'm confused about why you're here though. If you're right, then you're choosing to talk to an unpleasant person for the sake of arguing, and my thesaurus is accusing you of bickering. If you're wrong, you're the "unpleasant person on the internet". If there is a third option that I have carelessly overlooked, perhaps you will find some delight in putting me to work as the Simplicio in your essay on the arts?

I thought harder about this than you did, and that's why I lost. Thanks, !traditional_art@lemmy.world

[–] Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I hope you live up to your name someday

[–] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)