this post was submitted on 16 Dec 2024
290 points (99.3% liked)

politics

31407 readers
2830 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MagicShel@lemmy.zip 63 points 2 years ago (2 children)

AOC loses key vote in House Oversight race to Gerry Connolly

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 61 points 2 years ago (1 children)

an Old. White. man.

Seriously. It's pissing me off; more so the republicans doing it. we need minority voices. We can't expect the republicans to do it- lets just be honest here. and I doubt very much if Connolly will be able to push back nearly as much as AOC can and will. (never mind, whether or not he's willing.)

[–] Irremarkable@fedia.io 27 points 2 years ago (2 children)

An old white man with cancer that he announced a month ago. He should be focusing on his treatment, not adding more to his plate.

[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 14 points 2 years ago (1 children)

What the fuck? This is a special dipshit cherry to put on top of just automatically choosing the oldest option. Even if the leadership still hate AOC, choose someone who's definitely going to be at the top of their game, not award important positions to so he can be proud while taking time off for his pressing health needs.

[–] octopus_ink@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 years ago

What the fuck? This is a special dipshit cherry to put on top of just automatically choosing the oldest option.

He won because Pelosi wanted him to win. That is literally the answer.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

And give up all that juicy government funded healthcare?

[–] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Don't they get it for life as a perk? All he'd lose is the power

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

For the moment, maybe.

but I'm fairly certain he'd get better healthcare as a serving rep over a 'former' rep.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 35 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Gerry Connolly

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gerry_Connolly

The Congressman's Congressman. He represents the district right outside DC. Also, prior to running for office he worked as an aide to the United States Senate Committee on Foreign Relations where he managed committee oversight of international economic issues, international narcotics control, and United Nations and Middle East policies, and published reports on U.S. policy in El Salvador, Central America, Israel, and the Persian Gulf region.

So, expect a guy who will toe the line on all our accumulated foreign policy blunders while banging a gavel to silence another generation of anti-war protesters.

It gets worse than that, of course.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gerry_Connolly#Legislation_sponsored

Sponsoring legislation with Darrell Issa - a shameless, virulent Silicon Valley shill of a politician - as Trump lards up his cabinet with Friends of Peter Thiel is a bleak sign for the future.

[–] thisphuckinguy@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Dude is probably already in diapers. Old as fuck

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Apparently diagnosed with cancer, on top of it all.

Democrats would rather nominate a corpse to high office than a Millennial.

[–] thisphuckinguy@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

Yeah, the cancer diagnosis should have been enough for him to be out. What a shit-show.