this post was submitted on 14 Dec 2024
219 points (95.8% liked)

News

35749 readers
2561 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The 2024 US presidential election had been widely characterized as one of the most consequential political contests in recent US history. Although turnout was high for a presidential election – almost matching the levels of 2020 – it is estimated that close to 90 million Americans, roughly 36% of the eligible voting age population, did not vote. This number is greater than the number of people who voted for either Donald Trump or Kamala Harris.

More than a month on from polling day, eligible US voters from across the country as well as other parts of the world got in touch with the Guardian to share why they did not vote.

Scores of people said they had not turned out as they felt their vote would not matter because of the electoral college system, since they lived in a safely blue or red state. This included a number of people who nonetheless had voted in the 2020 and 2016 elections.

While various previous Democratic voters said they had abstained this time due to the Harris campaign’s stance on Israel or for other policy reasons, a number of people in this camp said they would have voted for the vice-president had they lived in a swing state.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Do you know nothing about Project 2025? You've had a long time to learn about it. The whole point is to keep Republicans in power perpetually and remove any need for legitimate elections.

And you think you can vote your way out of that?

(By the way, I love how you've gone from "this sort of arguing won't change anyone's mind" to "why aren't you trying to change people's minds?!?!")

[–] msage@programming.dev 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Re:btw what do you mean? It's the same thing: you should be trying to change people's minds, and be better at that, and I'm bringing your attention to it. You are a prolific poster all over the fediverse, so you can have a big impact on people. And I think you are aware of it.

I've known about the P25 for a long time, I'm well aware of its consequences. Burying our heads and losing our hope is the only way they can get away with it.

Kings have fallen, and we all should do our best to not create them again. That includes understanding those who voted for them. Ignoring the problem or its root cause won't change anything.

I keep repeating this line in my head:

The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing.

[–] Seleni@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They already got away with it.

[–] msage@programming.dev 1 points 1 year ago

They have not. As long as we fight, they will not get away with it.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Please do name the absolute monarch that fell because people had a vote and the monarch said, "fair enough," and stepped down.

And I like how your only two options are "vote expecting elections to be fair" and "do nothing."

[–] msage@programming.dev 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You are completely misrepresenting what I'm writing, and I'm done discussing with you.

Have a nice day.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Enjoy seeing your voting accomplish nothing ever again.

[–] msage@programming.dev 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm not an american, but I watch closely what's going on there.

You enjoy for self-fulfilling prophecies and laying down.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I thought you were done discussing it with me.

And yes, believing in Project 2025's aims, which Trump just re-endorsed, is a self-fulfilling prophecy.

I noticed you never gave any sort of rational pathway for Trump to offer fair elections or accept their outcome. Is it because there isn't one?

[–] msage@programming.dev 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Don't stick your head in the sand, oppose anything that threatens democracy, don't just accept defeat.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

Again, what is the rational pathway for Trump to offer fair elections or accept their outcome?

You know you can't answer that question because you know there isn't one.

And you still have this ludicrous idea in your head that the two options are "hope for a free and fair election" and "accept defeat."