this post was submitted on 07 Dec 2024
204 points (96.4% liked)

Data is Beautiful

1808 readers
1 users here now

Be respectful

founded 10 months ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] kemsat@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago (1 children)
[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

Not Oprah. Probably all 1999 other known billionaires to a greater or lesser degree, though. Social mobility is rung-by-rung; you can do multiples in theory but you have to get really lucky that many times in a row.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago (1 children)

This list is far from complete. The entirety of western royalty is missing for one thing.

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

That's a good point. Charlie III is so hereditary it's his whole brand. It looks like he might not actually have a billion, though, just most of one.

I'm not sure if any other European Royal families might have managed to retain more.

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 2 points 4 months ago

It's rung-by-rung, but the people in front of you are pulling it up behind them.