this post was submitted on 30 Jul 2024
5 points (100.0% liked)

196

19514 readers
41 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.


Rule: You must post before you leave.



Other rules

Behavior rules:

Posting rules:

NSFW: NSFW content is permitted but it must be tagged and have content warnings. Anything that doesn't adhere to this will be removed. Content warnings should be added like: [penis], [explicit description of sex]. Non-sexualized breasts of any gender are not considered inappropriate and therefore do not need to be blurred/tagged.

If you have any questions, feel free to contact us on our matrix channel or email.

Other 196's:

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] regul@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Yeah these 5 over 1s really ruin the neighborhood character of my suburban strip mall state highway hell.

Leave them as derelict auto body warehouses tyvm.

[–] TheFriar@lemm.ee 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Well, they’re building three in one go in my urban area. And they’re fucking up my neighborhood. The whole neighborhood is lower rise buildings and prewar apartment buildings, so they have character. And then they knocked down a grocery store to put up these three ungodly ass warts.

[–] bobs_monkey@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

They did a bunch of them near where I used to live. The problem with these (and really all unplanned high density housing) is that while their intent is to create walkable communities (a great idea in itself), they ignore the reality that most people are going to commute to a job, and they create the nastiest traffic bottlenecks ever. They're not bad when they're located next to a major highway with preplanned egress/ingress, but many of these halfwit developers will plop them with an entrance exit on an already busy 4 lane road and wonder why everything is all wacko.

[–] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I thought the idea of the post was the pictured buildings are far too small and we need much larger apartment buildings.

A desire for single-family homes (protecting suburb character) or no change (leave the warehouses) would be something else entirely.

Did I miss something?

[–] porous_grey_matter@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Climate-wise, 5-10 story buildings are the most efficient, and they are plenty dense enough to support a good level of public transport service etc. It's probably not desirable to go much bigger except in the most constrained areas.

[–] errer@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Source for them being more efficient than taller buildings?