this post was submitted on 22 Nov 2024
8 points (83.3% liked)

Anti-Trust

309 readers
1 users here now

a community focused on anti-trust news.

Friends:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] jackalope@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

My position is that I’m surprised by the rule of the law, as you can apparently both be a monopoly, and have (better) products in the same field, easily available, simply because people don’t care to learn alternatives

Why does this surprise you?

[–] iii@mander.xyz 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm confused how something can be a monopolly, when there's alternatives easlily available?

[–] jackalope@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Monopoly doesn't refer to literally a single seller. It's used to refer to disproportionate market power.