this post was submitted on 22 Nov 2024
8 points (83.3% liked)
Anti-Trust
309 readers
1 users here now
a community focused on anti-trust news.
Friends:
- https://lemmy.ml/c/unions
- https://sh.itjust.works/c/unions
- https://lemmy.ml/c/coops
- https://lemmy.ml/c/labor
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
You can't? Try using another search engines.
I'm not of the opinion google search is a good product. I understand that the law is being applied.
My position is that I'm surprised by the rule of the law, as you can apparently both be a monopoly, and have (better) products in the same field, easily available, simply because people don't care to learn alternatives.
To me, the above is a people problem, not a technological or business (or even law) problem.
I understand that, to the law, it isn't.
Why does this surprise you?
I'm confused how something can be a monopolly, when there's alternatives easlily available?
Monopoly doesn't refer to literally a single seller. It's used to refer to disproportionate market power.
Do you work for Google? What the fuck.
No? What makes you think that?