this post was submitted on 28 Nov 2024
648 points (98.6% liked)

News

37833 readers
1742 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The U.S. conservative political commentor Candace Owens was refused a visa to enter New Zealand for a speaking engagement because she had been banned from another country, immigration officials said Thursday.

News of the ruling came weeks after neighboring Australia also rejected her visa request, citing remarks in which she denied Nazi medical experimentation on Jews in concentration camps during World War II.

Owens is scheduled to speak at a series of events in several Australian cities and in Auckland, New Zealand, in February and March next year. Tickets remain on sale and there is no acknowledgement on the promoter’s website that she has been refused entry to both countries.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

A few co-workers does not a nation make.

[–] capital@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

This over-indexing on racism will have the left concentrating on the wrong things.

I can’t keep you from doing it. Just a warning.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It is not "over-indexing" to say that the U.S. is an incredibly racist country and Republicans are especially problematic in that area. Those are just facts.

https://www.pewresearch.org/social-trends/2019/04/09/race-in-america-2019/

Your anecdotal examples of co-workers does not trump data. Sorry.

[–] capital@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

You spoke of "facts" and then linked me a survey. After I asserted that lefties are wrong in their assessment of how the right sees race in relation to politics.

I believe Pew is a good source to get a good idea about what people think. This does not, however, mean ~~they~~ survey respondents are correct in their assessment or correctly ascribe racial motivation to a particular political party.

In fact, I believe you know this, given what's in your source:

And when it comes to views about racial discrimination, 78% of white Democrats say the bigger problem is people not seeing it where it really does exist, while a similar share of white Republicans say people seeing racial discrimination where it really does not exist is the bigger problem.

Who's right? It can't be both.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Democrats are right. Why is this even a question? Ask almost any person of color since you seem to think anecdotes trump data.

I mean for fuck's sake, the country just elected a racist who is putting a bunch of racists in his cabinet.

[–] capital@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Ask almost any person of color since you seem to think anecdotes trump data.

I can see what they think by reading your source.

I mean for fuck’s sake, the country just elected a racist who is putting a bunch of racists in his cabinet.

Is the election of Obama proof positive of the US' lack of racism? Or does it not work both ways?

Regardless, my assertion is that (most) people didn't vote for him because of his racism. They voted for him in spite of his racism because they actually think he'll make the country better. You and I know damn well Trump isn't going to make anything better but that doesn't stop them from believing it (sound familiar?).

Do you believe that Republicans, given the choice between Candice Owens and $whiteLeftyOrDem, Republicans are going 3rd party or voting $whiteLeftyOrDem? I assert they'd vote for Candice.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago

Ask almost any person of color since you seem to think anecdotes trump data.