this post was submitted on 27 Nov 2024
248 points (95.9% liked)

News

36000 readers
2265 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Warren Buffett gave $1.1 billion in Berkshire Hathaway stock to family foundations and detailed plans for distributing his $147 billion fortune after his death.

His three children will oversee giving the remainder within 10 years, with designated successors in case they predecease him.

Buffett, 94, reaffirmed his belief in avoiding dynastic wealth, favoring philanthropy instead.

Over the years, he has donated $55 billion to the Gates Foundation but plans to shift focus to his family’s foundations.

Buffett continues leading Berkshire Hathaway while preparing Greg Abel as his successor.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Because if it takes 10 years to donate that much and the market stays at its 10 year average growth they stand to have something like 190b dollars left when they are done donating that 149b.

[–] DeadWorldWalking@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

With that logic he should give it to Jeff Bezos so he can keep growing it after he's gone.

As long as the promise is on the horizon and they don't ever pay up then poor idiots will keep making excuses for them to not dump their ill gotten gains back into the system they stole it from!

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

It's the same promise gates has made for decades. I am going to donate all of it. And he has donated billions, but taxes are low enough on the rich, and loop holes are big enough that even while they give away money, they still make shit tons more.

Example, Gates left Microsoft in 2008 and just runs his charity, where he has given away billions, like almost 6 billion in 2022 alone. His net worth was 58 billion in 2008, it is now around 107 billion.

He has almost doubled his net worth, while donating more money than anyone can ever spend, annually.

[–] halfeatenpotato@lonestarlemmy.mooo.com 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You're completely neglecting the fact that he still has Microsoft stock.. plus, he's certainly holding stock in other companies. It's disingenuous to say that his increase in net worth between 2008 and 2024 is solely due to the money he's donated.

For what it's worth, I'm not pro Bill Gates or billionaires - I just feel like it's important to speak factually when trying to address an issue.

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

No it's the stocks and investments that make the money. Just as I was saying above. The 150b they are in charge of giving away over 10 years stands to make money back for them.

75b 10% interest over 10 years - 194b. The 10 year average of the stock market was actually 11% growth annually though.. so a little over 200b is what they may make donating his 150b.

That's why it's a 10 year span to give it away is what I was getting at. They could hold it and make a shit ton more, but in reality this way they look like good people for giving it "all" away, get tax breaks and make money

[–] halfeatenpotato@lonestarlemmy.mooo.com 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sorry, I misunderstood your previous comment. Thanks for the clarification. I agree that these charitable donations from billionaires are basically just positive PR stunts because there's essentially no tangible cost to them.

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yarp. Talked elsewhere about it somewhere the other day.

If Musk does nothing but leave his money right now invested. His 380b would be over 1T in that same 10 year time period.

Given his age, he's got about 35 years of life left, that would be around 14.6T if it grows at the same 11% annual rate.

So when he dies his money would be making about 4 billion dollars a day. (It would break out entire economy)

Just for giggles, that's over $46,000 a second

[–] randon31415@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I feel like you are inventing the concept of an endowment from first principles.

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

What do you mean?

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I'm pretty sure his foundations and the Gates stuff both are specifically designed to be left with zero money at the end.