this post was submitted on 31 Jul 2024

43 points (92.2% liked)

[Closed] Moved to !fedigrow@lemmy.zip

1584 readers

1 users here now

This community has moved to !fedigrow@lemmy.zip

Original sidebar info

To discuss how to grow and manage communities / magazines on Lemmy, Mbin, Piefed and Sublinks

Resources:

https://lemmy-federate.com/ to federate your community to a lot of instances
!fedibridge@lemmy.dbzer0.com to organize overall fediverse growth
!reddit@lemmy.world to keep tabs on where new users might come from :)
!newcommunities@lemmy.world
!communitypromo@lemmy.ca

Megathreads:

How (and when) to consolidate communities? (A guide)
Where to request inactive or unmoderated communities? (A list)

Rules:

Be respectful
No bigotry

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.works

threelonmusketeers@lemm.ee

43

LLM Chat Bots in our community (hackertalks.com)

submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by jet@hackertalks.com to c/fedigrow@lemm.ee

61 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Saw a suspicious post resurrecting a 5 month old thread, and after a few back and forths:

https://linux.community/comment/3453531

I don’t understand why you are treating me like a robot. However, I can help with the Fibonacci sequence. Here is a Python 3 function to calculate it:

I'm torn, its nice to have activity in the fediverse, but I'm not convinced bots are the right way to go about it. Opinions on the future of engagement bots?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] AnarchistsForKamala@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago

maybe dm's are better than quick banning, but my banning preference is for shoot-first-ask-questions-later, but short bans. a 1 to 3 day ban is better in most circumstances for most offenses. even repeated bad behavior, i feel should see the same term unless the bans themselves become burdensome to the mods.

i can see the case for dm's for suspected bots though.