this post was submitted on 30 Oct 2024
177 points (94.9% liked)

BestOfLemmy

9988 readers
5 users here now

Manual curation of great Lemmy discussions and threads

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 54 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

They added a line to the bot that includes Wikipedia’s stance on a source. And Wikipedia doesn’t consider MBFC to be reliable, so the bot reports that.

If you scroll below that, MBFC rates themselves as maximally reliable, which I’m sure is based off of a rigorous and completely neutral assessment.

Edit: although, reading the links in question they don’t seem to correspond to what the bot is saying. Perhaps this is some sort of mistake in how it was coded.

[–] Aatube@kbin.melroy.org 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's not a mistake, just confusing UX. The text in question comes from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MBFC

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

It doesn’t though. Or at least, I didn’t see anything resembling that on that page. If you can find it, let me know. It’s possible I missed it.

[–] taipan@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 8 points 1 year ago

Thanks, it seems to me like it should link here rather than to the main article.

[–] Aatube@kbin.melroy.org 4 points 1 year ago

sorry, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WP:MBFC. that's what i get for attempting type a link out on mobile