this post was submitted on 19 Jul 2024
13 points (100.0% liked)

Fuck Cars

15791 readers
713 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

x-post from !climate@slrpnk.net

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] yeahiknow3@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Those who make peaceful protests impossible make violent rebellion inevitable.

[–] graymess@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Right? If it's years in prison either way, they're about to find out what real eco terrorism looks like when protestors are ready to go all in.

[–] Etterra@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I'm constantly surprised that the endless unmonitored miles of oil pipelines don't ever bombed.

[–] Teppichbrand@feddit.org 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] WraithGear@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

“In an opinion article in The New York Times, columnist Ezra Klein wrote that "[a] truer title would be 'Why to Blow Up a Pipeline'", characterizing Malm's answer as "[because] nothing else has worked". Stating that Malm was "less convincing" about "whether blowing up pipelines would work here, and now", Klein argued that there would likely be political consequences to sabotage, including imprisonment of climate activists as well as political repression.[13]”

Whelp, Erza Klein can eat the whole of my ass.

[–] IIII@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (2 children)

That actively works against the cause because it would do so much harm to the local ecosystems

[–] WraithGear@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

That is a short term problem for trying to fight a long term catastrophe.

I would prefer to not cause a mess, and further harm natural spaces, but as you can see. Not only are passive demonstrations not effective, they have severe jail time. So at this point, i see it as the most logical step

[–] Excrubulent@slrpnk.net 1 points 2 years ago

And as these sentences get handed down and there are more political prisoners and martyrs, more people will start to think that way.

Current eco activists tend to be very conscientious and considered about what they're doing. As it gets more popular, you'll get people joining who are considerably less measured in their actions, and the likelihood of drastic actions increases.

[–] Bertuccio@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Well a lot of them run through more or less suburban areas. So doing it there would have lower environmental impact while greatly raising awareness of how many pipelines run through populated places.

[–] jol@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 2 years ago

Absolutely. From the end of the article:

Separately on Thursday, three airports were granted high court injunctions against fossil fuel and environmental activists protesting at their sites. Leeds Bradford airport, London Luton airport and Newcastle international airport were given injunctions banning protesters from trespassing or causing a nuisance.

[–] IsThisAnAI@lemmy.world -2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Getting someone fired for missing work isn't helping your cause in ANY way.

[–] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

You want to protect workers? Shitting on people who try to protect the environment isn't it.

Ban union busting, ban arbitrary firing, set up a worker protections.

Do those things first. Then come complain.

Grow some class consciousness.

[–] IsThisAnAI@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I do. I however approach it with a pragmatic strategy. Blocking traffic doesn't work. It doesn't change minds, it doesn't change policy. It prevents hourly workers from getting paid.

I agree with every thing you have said, except the execution. It hurts poor people and doesn't change policy.

[–] toaster@slrpnk.net 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

If anything the richest people are the ones driving to work. Cars are expensive.

[–] feedum_sneedson@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I can confirm that this is not the case.

[–] toaster@slrpnk.net 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Is bicycling and public transit not cheaper than owning a car?

[–] feedum_sneedson@lemmy.world -2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Not in my specific circumstances, no.

[–] toaster@slrpnk.net 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Why is that? I assume you've costed both of them out?

[–] feedum_sneedson@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Yes, I went without a car for many years but ultimately the kind of work I do and the area I live in requires it. It's a tiny hatchback which I use for my landscaping job. I am frequently mocked for it because I'm a very large and muscular guy, but I just tell people I'm compensating for my massive cock.