this post was submitted on 30 Jul 2024
-4 points (44.1% liked)
Casual Conversation
2200 readers
1 users here now
Share a story, ask a question, or start a conversation about (almost) anything you desire. Maybe you'll make some friends in the process.
RULES (updated 01/22/25)
- Be respectful: no harassment, hate speech, bigotry, and/or trolling. To be concise, disrespect is defined by escalation.
- Encourage conversation in your OP. This means including heavily implicative subject matter when you can and also engaging in your thread when possible. You won't be punished for trying.
- Avoid controversial topics (politics or societal debates come to mind, though we are not saying not to talk about anything that resembles these). There's a guide in the protocol book offered as a mod model that can be used for that; it's vague until you realize it was made for things like the rule in question. At least four purple answers must apply to a "controversial" message for it to be allowed.
- Keep it clean and SFW: No illegal content or anything gross and inappropriate. A rule of thumb is if a recording of a conversation put on another platform would get someone a COPPA violation response, that exact exchange should be avoided when possible.
- No solicitation such as ads, promotional content, spam, surveys etc. The chart redirected to above applies to spam material as well, which is one of the reasons its wording is vague, as it applies to a few things. Again, a "spammy" message must be applicable to four purple answers before it's allowed.
- Respect privacy as well as truth: Don’t ask for or share any personal information or slander anyone. A rule of thumb is if something is enough info to go by that it "would be a copyright violation if the info was art" as another group put it, or that it alone can be used to narrow someone down to 150 physical humans (Dunbar's Number) or less, it's considered an excess breach of privacy. Slander is defined by intentional utilitarian misguidance at the expense (positive or negative) of a sentient entity. This often links back to or mixes with rule one, which implies, for example, that even something that is true can still amount to what slander is trying to achieve, and that will be looked down upon.
Casual conversation communities:
Related discussion-focused communities
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Music is so much better than it used to be, it's fucking incredible.
I volunteer at a non-profit youth center. We host a lot of concerts, so basically I have a part time job as a booker.
The quality of the bands who are willing to play for $200 a night (which covers the cost of getting there and back, but not even a bed for the night) is insane!
Half the bands that play there for next to nothing are just as good as any that made it big 20 years ago.
And they're all on Spotify, so you can listen to any band you like as much as you like.
Trending music may suck, just ignore it.
$200 was the going rate in 1996. Now it's just greed on behalf of the ones buying talent.
It's all very depressing.
And who's talking about those unknown bands? I'm talking about global, popular music, not your indie band that only 1000 people know
My point is that back then popular music didn't equal crappy music.
Who cares what's popular globally? There are services like bandcamp and SoundCloud that make listening to what isn't the trending music so easy. If you can't enjoy something because it's niche, that is a you problem.