this post was submitted on 18 Oct 2024
273 points (97.6% liked)

News

35749 readers
2010 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] InverseParallax@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Power plants also need energy to start up (black start), and if there’s no grid energy to power those ancillary systems, or if the power plant doesn’t have on-site auxiliary generators to provide black start capability, they’re down until they can get power again from elsewhere.

This is huge, we have massive drills to make sure we can do this, and idle black start plants for just this purpose alongside almost an entire secondary grid for bootstrapping.

Electricity is expensive and hard as hell.

[–] bobs_monkey@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It trips me out that many of these plants don't have APUs for starting themselves up, or that they were designed in such a way that they require utility power to boot up. Like I understand that black starts could have problems with frequency sync with no point of reference, but I can't imagine that their control system circuits don't have any form of self-powering redundancy built in to their design. Is there any reason for this?

[–] InverseParallax@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

We didn't have digital controls when they were designed, so you couldn't use GPS or atomic clocks to synchronize frequencies, you just needed to have a single source of coordination. Those coils were manually controlled till not long ago.

Now we should be able to use some kind of small gas turbine with a igbt rig for synchronization, much like they do with wind turbines.

People often don't appreciate how far we've come over the past 2 decades, and how utterly manual and brute force we were until very, very recently.

[–] SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's why "smart grids" are talked about a lot recently, even though it doesn't mean much for the layperson. But for the people actually working in the industry, it matters a lot and can be a huge benefit

[–] InverseParallax@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yeah, but the utility's management... Holy shit.

They could trivially save billions a year just by adding intelligent load coordination and shifting for evs, you sign up and you save a few pennies a kwh, and in exchange they can steer load away from shortages and towards surplus. It's 1990s technology.

But management at places like Pge are just jobs programs for Newsom to sell to sew up the 2028 primary, which hilariously backfired for him (though im sure he cut a decent deal).

Most Ev loads are almost instantly dispatchable, it's an absolute no brainer, even if we aren't trying v2g, at least control when they charge.

[–] bobs_monkey@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Ah makes sense, I forget how old a lot of that infrastructure is. I do a lot of work for our local ski resort, they have a 12mw generation plant for their snowmaking system that can backfeed the utility if needed, and they're sync setup was basically two blinking lights that you had to visually time just right to close the switch and pray you didn't screw up lol.

[–] InverseParallax@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

BTW, there was money both in 2010 and 2021-2022 that was literally supposed to replace all those linkages with something less ancient, even for small things like yours.

My understanding is the money ran out halfway or so, maybe less, and even a lot of the big stuff didn't get done, they kept fighting on how to do it and the details, everybody wanred standardized on their system, and in the end very little actually happened.

[–] InverseParallax@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

That is hilarious, but also I can 100% picture it in my head, and it's not that far off from what the big machines did until recently, and pretty sure some still do.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 year ago

And where would Cuba get this tech from and how would they pay for it?