this post was submitted on 14 Nov 2026
95 points (99.0% liked)
Technology
89776 readers
2714 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
300 km/h, 400 km range, lifts 10 tonnes. Well, I'm not impressed at all. But it is electric. This part is cool.
From a performance standpoint, yes it's lacking. From an energy efficiency standpoint it's insanely well beyond fossil fuels.
For short, frequent hops, it could be practical depending the operating costs. The energy density of current battery tech is rough for aviation, but at least they’re trying.
Now I'm picturing small electric aircraft for smaller groups of people, similar to the prop planes Indiana Jones took in those movies.
One of the benefits of jet fuel based planes is that they get lighter as the journey continues as they exhaust their fuel, thereby increasing range. Obviously the weight of batteries never does so the current approach of battery powered electric flight will always have this burden with the only mitigation of developing batteries that weigh less.
I'm wondering if they solve for the high performance electric engines, they could pivot into liquid based fuel cells to provide the electricity. Direct Methanol Fuel Cell (DMFC) technology is well known today and not exotic. Methanol is one of the easiest hydrocarbons that can be created with electricity. Methanol is also energy-dense enough to be used as a good fuel too considering the space constraints on an aircraft. Using Methanol as a consumable would mean the jet would get lighter as it few just like jet fuel benefits.
My guess is the current barrier to this is the electrical yield of today's DMFCs isn't high enough to produce the power (energy in a moment) the electric jet engines would require. However, this means its another avenue for research that could make electric jets viable.
Wouldn't hydrogen cells provide a solution? Very small hydrogen powered engines output colossal power proportionally to their size and weight.
Hydrogen is pretty horrible as a portable fuel. Its density is extremely low even in liquid form as it only has 2.4 kWh per US gallon (~8.5 MJ/L) of energy compared to a gallon of gasoline at about 33.6 kWh (130 MJ). Methanol is ~17kWh for that same gallon and is liquid at room temperature. That liquid form of hydrogen also requires extremely high pressures and cryogenic storage which means heavier containment. You also then have to contend with boil-off. The hydrogen molecule is so very small it can leak through fittings and valves. Lastly, hydrogen on flame is almost invisible in daylight.
If this were a stationary application where weight and space considerations don't matter, hydrogen could be a better choice.
Hydrogen is cool but comes with significant issues. It leaks, it's extremely reactive, it's hard to store and transport, etc.
Well, liquid hydrogen is, anyway
Let's try to avoid repeating the Hindenberg.
Now compare it to e-vtol aircraft
It's a start. I mean, 5 of those tonnes are probably battery. But still...