this post was submitted on 13 Oct 2024
791 points (98.4% liked)

News

36270 readers
2637 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Analysts criticise lack of detail about the ‘robotaxi’ showcased by CEO Elon Musk

Tesla shares fell nearly 9% on Friday, wiping about $60bn (£45bn) from the company’s value, after the long-awaited unveiling of its so-called robotaxi failed to excite investors.

Shares in the electric carmaker tumbled to $217 at market close following an event in Hollywood, where the chief executive, Elon Musk, revealed a much-hyped driverless vehicle. The stock price is down roughly 12% year-to-date.

However, analysts said the event was short on detail and also expressed disappointment over a lack of specifics about other Tesla projects. Musk has a history of making grand projections about upcoming products and failing to follow through in the timeframe he has set, or at all.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] RandomStickman@fedia.io 91 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Investors we spoke to at the event thought the event was light of real numbers and timeline

Not like Elon is famous for keeping the timeline. Man on Mars and Tesla semi any day now.

[–] Euphorazine@lemmy.world 31 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Don't worry, Trump and Elon said that if Trump wins 2024, we'll have a man on Mars before Trump's term is over.

[–] PrincessLeiasCat@sh.itjust.works 28 points 1 year ago (2 children)

So from someone who works in human spaceflight, this is ridiculously outrageous.

I’m not insinuating that anyone thought it was realistic, but just confirming your suspicions.

[–] niemcycle@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago

Don't worry, since Trump will install himself as dictator for life, this means he has more than 4 years to get someone to Mars.

Then again, given Trump's age and diet, maybe 4 years is generous in and of itself...

[–] Dragonstaff@leminal.space 7 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Can you think of any realistic benefit to a manned mission to Mars?

Bringing back samples would be an amazing feat, and that seems a worthwhile mission. Having a human onboard seems to complicate things far more than any data that would give us would be worth.

[–] Baggins@feddit.uk 8 points 1 year ago

Once those ring gates open, Mars will be finished.

🤞

[–] fine_sandy_bottom@lemmy.federate.cc 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm not the person you asked and I don't know anything about such things so this is just supposition but...

I guess it's an important milestone on the way to colonising Mars. It would be an acknowledgement that we've solved (or mitigated...) all the problems in getting a human to and fro.

Now, if you're asking whether there's any realistic benefit to colonising Mars, the answer IMHO is "not in the next 50 years".

[–] Dragonstaff@leminal.space 2 points 1 year ago

Yeah, that's about what I'm thinking. A manned mission to Mars could be an interesting project for our kids or grandkids. Anyone talking about it in our lifetimes is just a grifter.

[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Lots of side benefits when solving the problems faced getting there.

There are lots of useful minerals on Mars.

Backup planet if earth gets asteroided

[–] FlowVoid@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

An asteroided earth is still more habitable than Mars.

Probably. And a lunar base is likely much more achievable for the same objective.

First, it’s crewed or human mission - inclusive language is important! :)

I do think human exploration is important because humans can cover longer distances faster. So your overall options for exploration increase. I do think both human and robotic are important and serve valuable purposes.

It would be more complicated with humans, but I think that’s also a valuable learning experience that could lead to technology that would benefit Earth.

I do not think “colonization” or whatever term you want to use should be a priority. I think science and exploration are what we should stick to, and if your excuse for colonization is because something bad will happen to Earth so we have to go somewhere else…just spend that time and those resources figuring out how to not fuck up Earth just to go fuck up the next place.

[–] GenosseFlosse@feddit.org 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Will this man be alive by the time he reaches mars, or returns to earth? Will the mars spacecraft have the same build quality and reliability as a Tesla Cybertruck, or will it blue screen after leaving the Earth's orbit?

[–] Pilferjinx@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

Dude, I'm positive he won't make it 2 years and then those christofascists can start with their project with JD couchfucking Vance as the president.