News
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person or their instance. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on. Keep on-topic
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.
Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.
7. No duplicate posts.
If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.
All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
view the rest of the comments
There's a reason USA has become a shithole, and that is that most Americans are dumb, and actually think 1% of the population deserve 50% of the wealth.
With that mentality, it is impossible to create real progress in USA.
It's more like 32% of the wealth for the 1%. And most of the 1% is not billionaires. Billionaires own around 5%.
Their real problem is millionaires. Or even just old people in general. People over 55 own 73% of the country's assets and any time you see that BlackRock and Vanguard and so on own a large share of a large company, that's their index funds, largely used by retirement funds. Of course even among old people it's strongly skewed towards the top 10 or 20 percent owning most of the wealth.
Billionaires are just a corner case of the millionaire problem, and taxing millionaires out of existence would also take care of the billionaires.
The 50% confusion there is from the wealth of billionaires (1000ish people) being more then the wealth 50% of the population have cumulatively, not 50% of the total wealth of the nation.
Those funds exist because businesses dumped pensions and made people become investors. If you want to put a real dent in the investor class, you make pensions 100 percent mandatory for a corporation.
Respectfully, this take is ignorant.
I mean ignorant in formal sense, in that you're speaking without a strong foundation of knowledge. But also in the informal sense in that frankly, what you're saying is ugly and insulting to the working class of America, whose capacity to think you dismiss on the basis that you don't know why they did something other than what you'd do.
To be clear: there ARE voters who match your description. However in many cases -- as was the case in California's billionaire tax -- those are not the deciding votes.
The people who decide elections are -- contrary to popular myth -- complicated.
In the Bay Area, residents voted both to reject the wealth tax AND reject a measure that would make it harder to raise taxes in the future AND voted to raise their own taxes through a 0.5% sales tax to fund a public transit rescue package.
From even a cursory glance at the results across CA's elections, it's clear that voters didn't have some flat left-versus-right metric, they demonstrated complicated, nuanced, choices.
Before concluding that this failed because working class voters are dimwitted savages too dumb to govern themselves, let's wait until organizers and academics actually study the returns.
And in 2028, I'm going to go back out and work on passing the next version of this.
The reason that the billionaire tax failed is that it’s stupid. Taxing unrealized gain is wrong in most voters minds. There is a much much better solution.
All billionaires hold their wealth in stock, which until they sell it is an unrealized gain - meaning that money is not being actively used by the owner monetarily. Their superpower is leveraging against those stocks to get a loan to buy the $500 M yacht (looking at you Bezos). Currently that is tax free. I will argue to my grave that getting a loan against stock held is now a realized gain and should be taxed as such.
TL/DR; if you tell the voters billionaires should be taxed when they get a loan against their stocks to buy a mansion, yacht or election they would vote for this in a heartbeat.
Property tax is already doing that though.
Who cares? That has nothing to do with my solution.
I think this is one of many possible adjustments, but I agree with your point that a lot of people had questions about how thoroughly this had been planned, and didn't quite trust the current version. That's how I felt (although I voted for it anyway).
Anyway, I agree with you that there will be other versions of this, and some version will eventually pass.