politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:

- Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
- No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
- No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
view the rest of the comments
I haven't signed it, I have not decided that Jeffries is corrupt. I also find myself wondering about racism, whether that's at play here. Further, republicans will now change their game, well come Jan 3, they're lame duck now. Take down the democratic leadership?
I am seeing this petition being posted in a lot of threads I'm reading this morning. With 50 cents per signature, that's a good incentive to spam it all over the place.
Well, corrupt or not, he has said he doesn't support going after the corrupt individuals in the current administration. That is enough of a reason for me to not want him in that job.
He has also said medicare for all is not possible.
if you haven’t made a decision yet about him being corrupted, you are either not paying attention or you are paying attention. either way your call that this is based on racism AND that we should not bother because republicans lost power anyways scream you are not being honest about your intentions.
You haven't decided that the Pacific Ocean is large either.
Fuck off with that bullshit. Jeffries is the hand picked protégé of Pelosi and in many ways is even more awful than her. His skin color and/or ethnicity has nothing to do with it.
Bullshit. It's not like they were passing much even WITH majorities in both chambers. Their main function was to not stop their Mango Messiah from constantly breaking the law.
In that aspect, ineffective and corrupt leaders like Jeffries and Schumer who haven't ever met a fascist they don't yearn to give concessions are not that different from the current fascists doing the same nothing because they support the crimes.
No. Replace them with others who actually represent the needs and wants of the majority of their constituency rather than the majority of donation dollars.
Because a shitload of people agree that he's an embarrassment in desperate need for replacement.
That's only for the one who first posted it. Unless she's illegally giving some posters a cut, nobody but she and the site are making any money from it being shared.
I was polite and respectful to you, and you tell me I'm full of bullshit, and don't know the Pacific Ocean is large. That's all I need to know I don't ever want to see another post of yours. Adios.
Not really, no.
Because you are.
No, that was just my way of illustrating how obviously corrupt Jeffries is regardless of whether you've decided that it's true.
I think I might manage to survive without your attention 🙄
To be fair the only reason you were told that is because it’s true.
Despite the downvotes, it sounds like you are responding in good faith. So I'll say, I've been watching Jeffries for a long time, and he is not a fighter. He just makes tepid speeches for even more tepid action still.
I can say with rare confidence there's no racism at play for me or the movement to oust him from leadership - everything I say about him is interchangeable with Schumer.
The bottom line is we need a wartime consigliere to seize this moment or we'll backslide in two years, and Jeffries ain't it.