this post was submitted on 05 Nov 2026
585 points (98.8% liked)

Technology

89533 readers
2741 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 313 points 1 day ago (3 children)

So it's going to fail and they're going to blame Graphene

[–] madmantis24@lemmy.wtf 85 points 1 day ago
[–] plenipotentprotogod@lemmy.world 65 points 1 day ago (2 children)

At least the rumors that it'd be a foldable seem to be wrong.

It's also initially launching with android 17. The article said that Graphene won't be ready for it until some time next year. I wonder if the devs are deliberately putting some separation between the hardware launch and OS availability so that they can avoid getting caught up in Motorola's corporate panic attack when this thing doesn't sell.

[–] atoro@lemmy.world 22 points 1 day ago

At least the rumors that it'd be a foldable seem to be wrong.

Only priced like one, unfortunately

[–] pmk@piefed.ca 2 points 18 hours ago

The foldable is the next one to get support after signature 27.

[–] InnerScientist@lemmy.world 21 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It doesn't release with graphene os so that would be stupid, it ships their android.

[–] pinball_wizard@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

Not offering a pre-installed GrapheneOS version feels like a misstep. Plenty of people are aware of the brand for security and privacy, and would pay extra to have it pre-installed.

Maybe we will see some re-sellers pop up, but I would prefer direct-from-manufacturer.

Not to mention, they could get the keys right from day one and eliminate (Google's) "alternate OS is booting" boogieman screen.

[–] AliOski@feddit.nl 3 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

They aren't shipped with GrapheneOS because the developers of GrapheneOS explicitly don't want this. They dont want any possibility of some backdoor caused by the manufacturer to bring down their reputation.

It not being shipped with GrapheneOS is on purpose.

[–] pinball_wizard@lemmy.zip 1 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

Yes. I'm waiting for a chill fork of GrapheneOS. I love what the developers have accomplished. LineageOS seems close, but not quite there with features, last I checked.

I was happy with decent default security and privacy in the past, and I could be, again, if it ever returns.

I would be glad to purchase a device from a trusted party, who pre-installed public source code, on open hardware.

I'll be very pleased if Framework ever releases a phone.

And sure, most people, in general, are clueless, about most things. Point granted.

But the people with a clue about today's brutal privacy situation want device that is reasonably assured to be respect their wishes, and not chained to the whim of some asshole CEO.

Perfect is lovely. But good enough can still sell very well.

[–] Ilandar@lemmy.today 17 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Plenty of people are aware of the brand for security and privacy, and would pay extra to have it pre-installed.

This is pure cope, there is no way "plenty of people" are lining up to pay this amount of money for a Motorola phone with a niche operating system.

[–] pinball_wizard@lemmy.zip 1 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

Just because something isn't mainstream doesn't mean it would not make plenty of money.

As was pointed out above, Motorola probably underestimates the casual folks who would pay extra to have GrapheneOS pre-installed, because the GrapheneOS developers are so rabidly against trusting anyone else to do the install.

But many GrapheneOS users just like having a qucik toggle for the microphone and camera.

(Side question: Why the fuck hasn't such a basic privacy feature made it into basic Android, anyway? Or has it, and I missed it?)

And yes, there's always a buyer for a phone this expensive. For some people, it will be their only computer for five to ten years, anyway.

[–] Seralth@piefed.seralth.com 2 points 15 hours ago

Not having it support tap to pay basically makes it a non starting for selling it.

The amount of stupid selling a phone with out that feature, while the same phone other times it works basically would just cause endless problems.

Yes people are that stupid