this post was submitted on 04 Nov 2026
638 points (99.4% liked)

Political Memes

12841 readers
2687 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

1) Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

2) No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

3) Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

4) No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

5) No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 26 points 4 days ago (1 children)

How is he actually still a candidate? Genuine question, I don't follow US politics that closely.

[–] BradleyUffner@lemmy.world 50 points 4 days ago (2 children)

He's not, but he still has the rest of his term to serve. Unfortunately there is no recall mechanism either.

[–] Waterpumpee@lemmus.org 35 points 4 days ago (1 children)

No recall mechanism/sanction for lying about intentions after the vote is the core problem of modern democracy. We read news in real time but takes 4 years to throw the liars out. Its too easy for the corrupt lot.

[–] perturbedstarstuff@lemmy.world 15 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I wouldn't say core problem but it's definitely a critical component missing from any ernest attempt at actual democracy.

[–] AmbiguousCabbage@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Yeah, it seems easily fixed. Also, instantly recallable delegates are a feature of anarchist systems, which representative democracy should learn from.

The challenge of designing/iterating on a better system is easier than the political challenge of getting a chance to try it.

And then you have to defend that chance from saboteurs, enemy propaganda, poisoning the discussions on how to proceed, sanctions, invasion, literally anything and everything the old world can do to try to smother it.

[–] Quadhammer@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago (3 children)
[–] Earthwormjim91@lemmy.world 8 points 4 days ago

The House and Senate have complete control over their members.

Each House may determine the Rules of its Proceedings, punish its Members for disorderly Behaviour, and, with the Concurrence of two thirds, expel a Member.

It would take 67 votes in the Senate, but they absolutely could expel him. That won’t happen because it would require getting now 12-14 republicans on their side to kick him out, and he’s useful to republicans.

[–] BradleyUffner@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I think that's the only real solution to the problem that's laid out in the current legal framework. It's historically pretty difficult to pull off though.

[–] shutz@lemmy.ca 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Doesn't impeachment require actual illegal acts?

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Impeachment is what Congress can do to other branches.

[–] BradleyUffner@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I believe you are right. I think the correct action they would take in this case is "expulsion from the Senate"

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago

Which as far as I know can't be done except by the body itself or if they are criminally charged with something

[–] Jarix@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

Not for his voting patterns