this post was submitted on 31 Oct 2026
394 points (97.6% liked)

Europe

12466 readers
578 users here now

News and information from Europe 🇪🇺

(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)

Rules

  1. This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
  2. No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
  3. Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
  4. No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, islamophobia, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism. We follow German law; don't question the statehood of Israel.
  5. Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
  6. If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
  7. Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in other communities.
  8. Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
  9. No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)
  10. Always provide context with posts: Don't post uncontextualized images or videos, and don't start discussions without giving some context first.

(This list may get expanded as necessary.)

Posts that link to the following sources will be removed

Unless they're the only sources, please also avoid The Sun, Daily Mail, any "thinktank" type organization, and non-Lemmy social media (incl. Substack). Don't link to Twitter directly, instead use xcancel.com. For Reddit, use old:reddit:com

(Lists may get expanded as necessary.)

Ban lengths, etc.

We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.

If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 7 or 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.

If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the admin that applied the rule (check modlog first to find who was it.)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

“If we want more growth, we need to allow creative destruction so new companies can deliver the productivity we need.”

Octopus energy ceo greg jackson

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 30 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I really do not like people boasting about how foreign dictatorships are doing everything better while bashing our local democracies.

I mean, electrification is one area where China is significantly and undoubtedly outdoing every single democracy out there. How democratic China is has no bearing on that fact.

[–] Redditquaza@feddit.org 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] mirshafie@europe.pub 1 points 1 week ago

Remind me, does Norway have electric trucks or does every household have an extra Tesla parked right beside their BMW?

[–] JensSpahnpasta@feddit.org 9 points 1 week ago (2 children)

How democratic China is has no bearing on that fact.

It does matter because this is totally what chinese state propaganda is broadcasting to the world. The old playbook the soviets have been doing

[–] Uferstein@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

That might be but then you have Audi with 87% less profit compared to the year before and that's not Chinese propaganda. He might be wrong about the trucks but he isn't about electrification.

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 week ago (2 children)

They also are using a ton of coal and oil to recharge them.

They get away with looking better on per capita CO2 production because they have such a huge population, but it’s not all solar panels and rainbows there by any means.

[–] Awooooooga@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Their electrical grid is old and can't handle the crazy amount of solar energy they're producing. So they need to run coal plants to keep providing power.

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 1 points 1 week ago

Even then EVs are better because they're more efficient (requiring less fossil fuels per unit distance), but also almost half of China's energy comes from green energy. Taken together this is objectively good.

[–] filcuk@feddit.uk 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (4 children)

I don't know if I agree. A dictatorship decides to make more batteries and so the industry bends. Land is taken by the state to build mines. Little regard for the people or the environment.
All of this makes it easier for China to just move to electric, and part of why the EVs they export are so cheap.
They subsidise by environmental impact and possibly human suffering.

* Not to mention they own the battery market.

[–] bestagon@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I don’t think there’s a country in the developed world with a government that finds it distasteful to subsidize the consumption of their populace with environmental and human suffering. Moral superiority isn’t the difference being spotlit here. I think China just controls more manufacturing of its own which makes pivoting their society more efficient

[–] filcuk@feddit.uk 1 points 1 week ago

The question was about politics and economics, not morals.
I would hope not supporting suffering and destruction doesn't need to be explicitly stated to be understood.

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I'm not sure the argument "EVs are bad for the environment actually" works as well as you think it does.

[–] filcuk@feddit.uk 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I wasn't arguing that. The way China mines and processes lithium for battery manufacture, in which they're the leading exporter by far due to their rich rare earth deposits, is destroying the surrounding areas.

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That's fair, but my point is: Is there any way to make lithium ion batteries otherwise? Like is there any evidence that for instance Australian lithium is "greener" so to speak?

[–] filcuk@feddit.uk 4 points 1 week ago

I see, yes my understanding is that the process can be a lot cleaner and other countries do it (like the US), China just chooses to take cheap shortcuts to take stranglehold of the market, which they now have.

[–] Awooooooga@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

I live in Canada and they're building an LNG plant in my town. Nobody who lives here wants it but the federal government and province do so we can't do shit about it lol.

[–] PixelGhost@lemmy.eco.br 1 points 1 week ago

Land is taken by the state to build mines.

A nation taking land for its strategic needs is called "expropriation". I don't know your country, but I'm sure it does that as well, because this is something all of them do.