this post was submitted on 28 Oct 2026
333 points (97.2% liked)

politics

31566 readers
3010 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] DigitalTraveler42@lemmy.world 90 points 21 hours ago (10 children)

Honestly we need her in the Senate for at least two terms before she's president, once she's served her terms as president she'll be stuck as powerless as Obama probably feels rn, let's milk having someone like her for as long as possible, and that starts with her taking that feckless shit head Schumer's Senate seat.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 5 hours ago

Obama is only "powerless" because he has chosen to be.

Taft became the Chief Justice of The US Supreme Court after leaving the office of president.

[–] kestrel7_7@lemmy.world 4 points 4 hours ago

Obama could totally run for Senate at any point. Presidents have done it before

[–] TrackenDaKracken@lemmy.world 5 points 5 hours ago

I get what you're saying but she'll do much more good as President than sitting in Congress.

Trump showed just how much power the office has, for someone willing to wield it.

[–] emmy5482@quokk.au 1 points 5 hours ago

I don't think the world or America can wait that long.

[–] 4am@lemmy.zip 34 points 17 hours ago

Fuck everything about this; strike while the iron is hot or be ruled by pedofascists forever. You won’t get another chance. You do not realize the danger we are all in.

[–] londos@lemmy.world 26 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

She can serve in congress after her presidential terms, no?

[–] BigBenis@lemmy.world 2 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

No president leaves office popular enough to win a race for a Senate seat

[–] kestrel7_7@lemmy.world 4 points 4 hours ago

Andrew Johnson

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 12 points 9 hours ago

I'm certain that isn't true. They are just normally done with all the shit and don't want to deal with a lot of the same shit but with the addition of being out ruled by any of the other assholes in Congress.

[–] halfapage@lemmy.world 46 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

customary way would be to wait until she's in her 70s

[–] sik0fewl@piefed.ca 10 points 18 hours ago (1 children)
[–] darvocet@infosec.pub 2 points 18 hours ago

Exactly... this is the way. She's not electable until she's similar in age to Susan Collins.

[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 10 points 16 hours ago

No legislator is more valuable sitting as one of 100 for a decade or two than taking their turn as president.

[–] xtr0n@sh.itjust.works 1 points 20 hours ago (1 children)
[–] CrimeIsLegalNow@ani.social 32 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (1 children)

Nah. Retiring after a presidency is a tradition, not a law. Hit them while you have momentum from midterms (hopefully).

Then if she still wants anything to do with this trash fire she can just go back to being senator.

[–] xtr0n@sh.itjust.works 8 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

It’s probably a tradition for a good reason. I suspect that 8 years of being president is exhausting and leaves even the best of us spent physically, mentally and emotionally (current golfer in chief being a notable exception)

[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 2 points 5 hours ago

Even lazy-ass Trump is not immune to the rapid aging affect of being president. The difference is that it's usually due to the stress of trying to effectively run the country, while his is due to his manic narcissism from being in the spotlight 24/7.

[–] Obviouslywrong@lemmy.world 9 points 18 hours ago

Obama is still young enough that after a long break now he could do another Senate term or a relatively brief federal judge shipfor 5to7 years comfortably.