this post was submitted on 15 Oct 2026
738 points (98.8% liked)
Wikipedia
5445 readers
143 users here now
A place to share interesting articles from Wikipedia.
Rules:
- Only links to Wikipedia permitted (an exception is made for news about Wikipedia, where outside news sources are permitted)
- Please stick to the format "Article Title (other descriptive text/editorialization)"
- Tick the NSFW box for submissions with inappropriate thumbnails
- On Casual Tuesdays, we allow submissions from wikis other than Wikipedia.
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
"I'm neither right not left" = far-right. Always.
Yep, it's called Fish Hook Theory:
Note that there is no such theory outside of Internet slang. There is no merit in it. Just as horseshoe theory is without merit. There are complex, underlying causes for it making so much sense, but do not be baited by comfort.
The only part of horseshoe theory that tracks is that if you go far enough left you get your guns back.
The part that tracks is that authoritarians exist orthogonal to left/right.
And that those unwilling to compromise on anything with anyone tend to get authoritarians
Funny, it's usually the centrists who partner with and allow authoritarians into power
In a german state election the BSW, a left wing splinter party, just just gave their support to the afd, an extreme right-wing party, getting fascists in to power within germany for the first time since WW2.
Oh, the party of the Kreml-bankrolled ”leftist” backed up the far-right party. Oh my.
Moving the goal post. They arose from the SED. They are of leftist origin.
The point being they splintered from a true leftist party and were not from the centre.
"Horseshoe theory" is the idea that I don't really care if I'm being killed by Hitler or Mao if I'm being killed.
Death by centrist is impersonal. It's your fault for not hustling hard enough for AC.
The main difference between "neither left nor right" and far-right is hypocrisy.
Or sometimes denial
Don’t forget idiocy.
Nah it's not that complicated. Nazis are just lying manipulative fucks. That's their main thing.
Some green parties tried the same nonsense for a while, though I think they all admit to being left by now. The argument was that they'd work independently of party blocks with climate as the only issue.
Of course right wing politics are always an environmental disaster, but sometimes you would see unusual constellations in local politics.
Reminder that the Nazis literally called themselves National Socialists. They were the opposite of course and swiftly destroyed any trace of socialism once they were in power. That's what far-rights do.
also notice the confusing "centre party" means they are "both sides", its to trick would be voters into voting for them who dont care enough to read past thier party name.
Wasn't fascism originally about being neither right nor left, but then it got sort of absorbed (or bought out) by the right to combat the left? Thats atleast how I've understood it, and of course there is so much more to fascism than that but thats just how i'd summarize it
I only know that the Nazis presented themselves as the "third way" between communism and capitalism.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ernst_R%C3%B6hm
That didn't last long.