this post was submitted on 08 Oct 2026
250 points (99.6% liked)
Technology
88677 readers
3776 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
No sympathies; nonprofit ceo's choose to follow big tech rather than their opensource nonprofit brothers and sisters.
I have sympathy for non-profits. Did you ever use Gmail or Google Drive? Same concept.
If they're smart enough, they'll look for greener pastures, if they double down that's when my sympathy ends.
Non profits likely can't afford a team of tech workers to maintain opensource infrastructure. Avg tech worker salary in the states is $100k, you'd need two or three staff for coverage/to avoid key-person risks, so you're looking at $200-300k to retain internal teams to use opensource tech, in salaries alone. Opensource doesn't mean 'free' too, as many businesses will generally require some sort of support/enterprise agreement for risk management/audit reasons -- so they'll pay lic fees on top of the salaries.
The technology supports the business, but it isn't the business -- sorta like a pizza shop may need a brochure-website to advertise their services/take orders, but their actual business is pizza. Someone who's specialising in pizzas, shouldn't need to learn how to maintain an opensource server stack. If you get a 'golden goose' staff member, who's some university student genius that loves pizza and will happily maintain opensource infrastructure on the side, then your business is totally fucked if that person leaves because finding a replacement with similar skills is nearly impossible / very expensive.
They can outsource it to a third party, as most businesses do. And then that third party goes through the same general calcs, and settles on big box tech solutions for similar reasons.
I don't think its as clear cut as you seem to imply.
Hosted nextcloud services start at $5/month. It scales up for more users, but so does Microsoft.
Hosted -- so from a company perspective, still Cloud. Still subject to similar potential risks.
Yeah, but they aren't Microsoft and have competition, so they might care if they lose your business. Unless you're a big company or state actor, Microsoft probably wants your data more than what little money you have. Especially if they don't get any money from you because you're on some kind of charity plan.
A small local company is also more likely to help you with an individual backup solution if something off the shelve doesn't fit you.
Not all clouds are equal.
No, what they actually can’t afford to do is rely on Microsoft? That’s who lost their data in reality?