this post was submitted on 28 Sep 2026
979 points (99.3% liked)

Technology

88390 readers
3698 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] pluge@piefed.social 102 points 3 days ago (3 children)

We NEED to put this kind of pressure on all ALPR companies. I don't mean to take the foot off the gas with Flock, but I'm so afraid that Axon and Motorola and others will swoop in once Flock is gone, and everyone will be done with/tired of this particular public fight.

[–] littlewonder@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

But also put that pressure on your local city councils (and other state and local government entities) that keep perpetuating this surveillance.

They are often the ones signing on the dotted line for these contracts at the insistence of their ostensibly subordinate law enforcement.

[–] FlexibleToast@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

This sort of data collection by private companies should just straight up be illegal. If they're not beholden to the bill of rights, I don't want them maintaining this sort of data.

[–] Yerbouti@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

What about, let's say Google? They have much more personal informations about you than a camera will ever provide. They basically have the location data of 75% of Americans at any minutes. Why don't you start by putting pressure on them?

[–] EvilHankVenture@lemmy.world 12 points 2 days ago (1 children)

That is opt-in. Doesn't make it ethical but it is a much different question. I can always leave my phone at home but I can't opt out of Flock cameras.

[–] Yerbouti@sh.itjust.works -1 points 2 days ago

I mean yeah, you could also not have a phone at that point.

I could argue that you can cover your face or stay home if you don't want to be filmed in public.

To be clear, I despise Flock but it's just a camera business. You have much bigger problem than that and shooting the CEO wont magically fix anything. Where do they get the database to identify people? Focusing on Flock while GAFAM gets your fingerprints, emails, locations, contacts, heart rate, etc. is just.... not a good strategy. Mass surveillance goes way beyond camera and Flock is just a business, they will get replace by another one if you don't fix the problem at it's source.